Search for: "Berkeley v. Berkeley" Results 921 - 940 of 2,732
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2016, 2:35 pm by Joe Mullin
Schmidt took the stand in San Francisco today in the second Oracle v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Katz, The Role of Public Reason in Obergefell v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Berkeley study: 7-8% of notice were possible fair uses—remixes, mashups, and covers. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Brianna Schofield, University of California-Berkeley School of Law: Research study looked into use of tech by notice senders and OSPs. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
   Brianna Schofield University of California-Berkeley School of  Law: Tremendous diversity in how service providers interact w/the notice system. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:00 pm by EEM
"Displaced: A Proposal for International Law to Protect Refugees, Migrants, and States," Berkeley Journal of International Law (Forthcoming, 2016) [eprint via SSRN] "Risk Assessment or Risk Avoidance? [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 1:08 pm by Jason Rantanen
  Menell, Professor, University of California, at Berkeley School of Law. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The precursors to the right of marriage equality—now recognized under the federal Constitution, as discussed here—were ordinances adopted first in Berkeley, California, in the 1980s and later in virtually every major city that established domestic partnership registries. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 7:39 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Bidish Sarma (University of California, Berkeley School of Law) has posted How Hall V. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
But last week the Ninth Circuit decided a case that shows how tricky government consideration of race can be, and how lower court judges sometimes make missteps in this complex area.The case is Mitchell v. [read post]