Search for: "Bills v. State" Results 921 - 940 of 19,964
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2019, 8:45 am
  As President Trump doubles down on dangerous and inflammatory lies about abortion, when abortion access is under attack all over the country, with politicians in state legislatures passing new restrictions designed to make abortion impossible to access or to challenge Roe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:18 pm
The Court notes, however, that since the rule was last affirmed by the Court in Harrison v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm by Covington & Burling LLP
”  A press release accompanying the bill’s introduction stated that Congressman Pallone introduced the bill “to protect consumers from the bombardment of dangerous and unwanted calls and texts that have been exacerbated by the Supreme Court’s decision in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 6:43 pm
The bill would authorize the transfer of cases originally brought in state court to federal court. [read post]
7 May 2013, 10:45 am by Harold O'Grady
The Senate, by a vote of 69-27, passed S. 336, the Marketplace Fairness Act of 2013, a bill designed to restore States’ sovereign rights to enforce State and local sales and use tax laws. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:10 am by Todd Ruger
The hearing will also include testimony from Anthony Johnstone, a University of Montana School of Law assistant professor who was Montana Solicitor when he drafted an amicus brief for 26 states in the campaign finance challenge of Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Most intriguingly, somewhere on the journey from Campbell v MGN to the draft Online Safety Bill, ‘Reasonable’ has been jettisoned. [read post]
11 May 2022, 11:32 am by Jessica Arons
There are some things we don’t know about the leaked Supreme Court opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Any order requiring any sort of journalistic material to be handed over to the state engages the right to freedom of expression of publishers and broadcasters under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and will amount to an interference for the purposes of Article 10 (see eg Handyside v United Kingdom and Tillack v Belgium). [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:58 am by The Erlich Law Office, PLLC
 Such laws have been passed around the country and have received heightened attention since the Supreme Court in Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 8:16 am by Ingrid Wuerth
A 1781 Pennsylvania state court case against the state of Virginia, Nathan v. [read post]