Search for: "Black v. State"
Results 921 - 940
of 9,198
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2017, 12:48 pm
He showed her a black 2009 Dodge Charger with body damage and mileage of 107,000. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:35 am
State (1860) the Texas Supreme Court ruled "the state had a duty to provide counsel for blacks who could not afford their own - a progressive notion that would not be enshrined in federal jurisprudence until more than a century later." [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm
Wrong Burt LancasterThe United States Supreme Court recently decided Metrish v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 8:30 am
This meant that two representations had to be provided: one in colour and one in black and white. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 10:39 am
Just last term, in Timbs v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:13 am
State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 7:19 am
Cullen tried to escape imprisonment by asserting a number of technical defenses, but to no avail.The decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 9:47 am
However, the Supreme Court in Shelby County v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 7:58 am
Google; Black v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:53 pm
I joined a group of law professors and public-interest groups that filed an amicus brief Friday in the case of United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 5:23 am
Roberto Coin, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 2:00 pm
The Supreme Court ruled in another case this year, Buck v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 8:55 am
” This Article also examines strands of “visionary Black feminist pragmatism” (as elaborated by V. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:05 am
The Mississippi Supreme Court repeatedly found that prosecutors had acted intentionally to exclude black jurors and that these trials were thus unconstitutional under Batson v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 6:22 am
Victory Global, LLC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 11:33 am
Facts: This case (Ostrinsky v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 11:33 am
Facts: This case (Ostrinsky v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:41 pm
See United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 6:46 pm
The first, State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 2:02 pm
For such a short and unanimous opinion, Jones v. [read post]
