Search for: "Blake v. State"
Results 921 - 940
of 986
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jan 2007, 1:30 pm
Despite that decline, the number of criminal appeals in 2006 surpassed by more than 25% the number of filings in the years before the Court's decision in Blakely v. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:15 pm
Booker and Blakely v. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 4:07 pm
greatly impact the application of Blakely in the states (details here), and Claiborne and Rita could (and likely will?) [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 10:01 am
State of Indiana. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 10:39 am
Dec. 28, 2006) (available here) (7-2 decision): The Washington State Court of Appeals "reversed the trial courts, holding that under Blakely v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 6:22 am
State; Kolb v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 3:21 pm
Here is the abstract: In United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:56 am
Here is the abstract:Soon after the Supreme Court in Blakely v. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 10:35 am
He also argues that the restitution and registration orders were im-posed absent jury findings required by Blakely v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 3:06 am
To sample two of Judge Rosenblatt's decisions in which he infused his dogged pursuit of historical background information, see two of my favorites: Blake v. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 8:49 am
" Read more about the Burton appeal here in The National Appellate Journal, which writes that Burton asks: the Supreme Court the following questions: (1) Is the holding in Blakely v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
[No petition for review filed].Blake Cooper, a Reno County public defender, won in State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 9:19 am
Washington, 2004, limiting admission of out-of-court statemens by absent witnesses; Burton is about retroactivity of Blakely v. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 8:20 am
The Court will consider the retroactive application of Blakely v. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 4:41 pm
Waddington (05-9222), which "considers whether to make retroactive, to earlier cases, its 2004 decision in Blakely v. [read post]
4 Nov 2006, 8:07 pm
As Blakely only applied to state guidelines, the court took up the matter of the application to Federal Sentencing in US v. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 8:40 am
Supreme Court ruling in Blakely v. [read post]
30 Oct 2006, 3:26 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Blakely v. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 3:24 pm
Continuing its amazing work as the Blakely frontier, today in Smart v. [read post]
15 Oct 2006, 7:39 am
US v. [read post]
