Search for: "Brett Thomas" Results 921 - 940 of 1,481
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2021, 12:28 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Clarence Thomas echoed Roberts’ skepticism about trying to draw a bright line between on-campus and off-campus speech in the era of social media. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 7:52 pm by Jayesh Rathod
Thomas and Justice Brett Kavanaugh seized upon a statutory argument in the government’s brief, noting that “notice to appear” is defined in the provision as “written notice,” and that the latter phrase might reasonably contemplate more than one document. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 1:20 pm by Ilya Somin
Conservative justices Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh joined the Chief Justice's majority opinion, as also did liberals Sonia Sotomayor and Stephen Breyer. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 3:01 pm by Shaakirrah Sanders
Thomas and Justice Amy Coney Barrett highlighted the abuse-of-discretion standard in People v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 9:24 am by Adam Feldman
For the purpose of this post, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor/Alito, Justice Antonin Scalia/Justice Neil Gorsuch, Justice Clarence Thomas, Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh are coded as conservative justices. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:45 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Brett Kavanaugh asked Turner to focus on “the actual dispute as it exists now. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:04 am by Amy Howe
At least three justices – Thomas and Justices Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh – appeared inclined to agree with Stewart and overrule Roe and Casey outright. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Adam Feldman
Baude cited Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurrence in last term’s Gamble v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 7:33 am by Abbe R. Gluck
That’s why it was significant that, in the span of a week with a decisive 7-2 alignment in both cases, the court emphatically reaffirmed what Justice Brett Kavanaugh in Political Consultants called these “ordinary severability principles. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:56 am by John Malcolm
In a dissent joined by Thomas, Justice Samuel Alito argued that “the majority’s interpretation of § 922(g) is not required by the statutory text, and there is no reason to suppose it represents what Congress intended. [read post]
Taken in historical order, they were Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
28 May 2019, 6:56 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
” Roberts for the court Roberts wrote the opinion for the court, joined in full by Justices Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito, Elena Kagan and Brett Kavanaugh, and by Justice Clarence Thomas in all but one part. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Corbin Barthold
Some—including Justice Thomas—have called for it to be reexamined. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am by Jeremy Gordon
Readers interested in learning about another Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act case currently before the Supreme Court, Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:31 am by Amanda L. Tyler
Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion for the Supreme Court (joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh) addressed Thuraissigiam’s claims sequentially. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Sears, Tommaso Tani, Simone van der Hof Global Internet Law: Ethics and the Law, Thomas H. [read post]