Search for: "Britain v. Britain"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,456
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2011, 10:55 pm
The Court held that: Decisions weighing the public interest in deportation against the private interest of the appellant and his family in his private and family life are often difficult and cannot easily be categorised as perverse” [§23] Lord Justice Longmore referred to MA (Somalia) v SSHD [2010] UKSC 49 when the Supreme Court reminded the Court of Appeal that it: should not be astute to characterise as an error of law what is no more than a… [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm
In contrast to this, Britain has introduced a single publication rule, with a one-year limitation period. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm
The survey commissioned by Conservative MP Andrew Rosindell further confirms this, containing the statement “Britain must stand firm against terrorism and extremism”, the two options being “Yes – Protect British people against evil! [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:16 am
New Britain police Sergeant Chute testified concerning . . . his forensic analysis of [Vega’s] telephone. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
Lidl Great Britain v Tesco Stores [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch) and [2023] EWHC 1517 (Ch) (April, June 2023)This spring/summer blockbuster stretches to 317 paragraphs in its main judgment plus another 50 in the form of order judgment. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:42 am
R. v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 6:05 am
Borden v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:43 am
State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 5:14 pm
” The Hindu volunteer The most recent decision was in the case of Sharma v Sharma [2014] EWHC 3349 (QB) which involved adherents of Britain’s second-largest minority faith, Hinduism. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:23 am
The Government of the United States of America v Richard O’Dwyer. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 8:27 am
Initially, some U.S. courts borrowed Britain’s Hicklin Test for defining obscenity, which called for “judging obscenity by the effect of isolated passages upon the most susceptible persons” (Roth v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 4:47 pm
In 2022 we will continue to cover case law from Britain, Europe and around the world and other issues such as “online harms” legislation. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 7:23 am
Bush and Sprint Communications v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 10:35 pm
Newman v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:51 pm
In R. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 6:31 am
In Martin v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 5:55 am
Margaret holding a portion of Kings & Queens of Great Britain/Photograph by Donna Sokol [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 10:54 am
Marshall, of course, would become the paradigm-shifting fourth Chief Justice and author of the decision in Marbury v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 11:59 am
I remember sending her P V Baker QC's great work Snell on Equity’ * many years ago - with a bookmark at the page on secret trusts. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:12 am
Industrial policy » Great Britain. [read post]
