Search for: "Bush v. Bush" Results 921 - 940 of 6,297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2018, 5:59 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Circuit judge, originally nominated by President Bush in 2006. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 2:14 pm
  But his meaning was clear enough: he meant he would not appoint the kind of judges who voted in the majority in Roe v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:04 pm by James Romoser
That would set the stage for targeted post-election litigation over ballot-counting procedures – essentially a reprise of Bush v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 2:01 pm by John Bellinger
”  Only a handful were transferred out of Guantanamo in December 2008 and January 2009 because of court orders after the Supreme Court decided in Boumediene v Bush that detainees should have the habeas court right to challenge their detention. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 3:37 pm
The Supreme Court will hear arguments next month in a case called Wyeth v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:37 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
 (the First Amendment Establishment Clause and a church’s power to control a liquor license) — in a long career and assessing the problem and real impact of the Supreme Court taking on Bush v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:51 am
Where to find yesterday's oral argument? [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:00 pm by Cyrus Farivar
NapInterrupted A handful of jurisdictions nationwide reported various computer-related problems that hampered some voters as Americans went to the polls on Tuesday. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 7:29 am by Tom Smith
Bush’s White House, which argued that race should not be a significant factor. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 5:00 pm
At FindLaw, Vikram David Amar has this column on the Court's ruling in the Lance v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:32 am by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
Sims, as well as Justice Harlan's largely forgotten dissent in Taylor v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 4:38 pm
Oregon and Hamdan v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:02 am
" Justices Souter and Ginsburg in CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, et al., PETITIONERS v. [read post]