Search for: "C & D Holdings, LLC"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,557
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
Soverain Software LLC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 11:00 am
LeanSpa, LLC, 2013 WL 331233 (D. [read post]
28 May 2020, 6:13 am
D. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:17 pm
David is the CEO of Kroll and its parent company, Corporate Risk Holdings, and John is President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:30 am
United States (Patently-O) CAFC finds claim construction arguments waived on appeal: Enovsys LLC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:50 pm
Newman and John D. [read post]
What's so bad about "business method" patents? Small PR firms "goosed" by a patent on press releases
21 Jul 2010, 5:52 pm
The plaintiff behind the suit is a strangely named patent-holding company: Gooseberry Natural Resources, LLC. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:06 pm
Transpacific Steel LLC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 4:07 am
Butterball, LLC, No. 08-5071-CV-SW-RED, 2009 WL 3486780, at *4 (W.D.Mo. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 8:35 pm
Properties, LLC, 2018 WL 5880748 (C.D. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 7:39 am
§ 125.8(c)(1). [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:21 am
A court may also consider whether: (a) the same plant is being used; (b) the employees are the same; (c) the same jobs exist; (d) the supervisors are the same; (e) the same equipment and methods of production are being used; and (f) the same services are being offered. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
(IP Osgoode) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Second District Court declares Qui Tam provisions of false marking statute unconstitutional: Rogers v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
(Docket Report) District Court C D California: Failure to identify intervening rights during discovery sinks prosecution laches defense: Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(GRAY on Claims) District Court E D Texas finds Applied Medical Resources liable for infringement of Covidien’s surgical device patent (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas limits number of patent claims and prior art references asserted in case: SynQor, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Non-practising entity entitled to permanent injunction where infringed patent was the subject of prior exclusive license:… [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 11:24 am
Joan C. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm
§ 47-1827(b), (c), and (d) violate the free speech clause of the First Amendment by criminalizing trespass by deception at animal facilities with intent to damage the enterprise. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:24 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:10 am
Spina, and Robert C. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 10:13 am
P. 37(c)(1). [read post]
