Search for: "COUNTS v. COUNTS" Results 921 - 940 of 20,586
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2017, 7:22 am by The Swartz Law Firm
  A three-judge panel was reversed in U.S. v Roy by the En Banc court and the defendant’s conviction in federal court in Miami was reinstated for reasons explained below. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:28 pm by Zachary Spilman
This leaves (by our last count) 6 cases to be decided this term, plus the Art. 62 issue in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:07 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Uncharged offense In 1991, Luis Sims, appellant, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City of the first-degree murder of Israel McCloud, the attempted first-degree murder of Shirley Palmer, and two counts of using a handgun in a felony or crime of violence. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 2:20 pm by Unreported Opinions
Criminal procedure — Jury instruction — Involuntary manslaughter Bryan Hannah, appellant, was charged with first-degree murder, use of a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence, wearing, carrying and transporting a handgun, and two counts of possession of a regulated firearm after a disqualifying conviction. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:20 pm
  The Ninth Circuit decided back in 2009 that petty theft in California counts, the California courts subsequently refined the contours of that offense so that it probably doesn't count anymore, but subsequent Ninth Circuit panels didn't really examine the new state law precedent and simply followed the 2009 case. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 10:58 am by Wells Bennett
The Espionage Act and Intelligence Identities Protection Act counts thus will go forward, along with a false statements count that Kiriakou had not attacked in his motion. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 7:54 am by Gregory B. Williams
  In recommending the Court to grant Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings with respect to the dismissal of Counts III, IV and V of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, Judge Burke agreed that Plaintiff’s conversion and unjust enrichment claims (Counts III and IV) are preempted by federal patent law, and that Plaintiff’s negligent misrepresentation claim (Count V) is deficient as a matter of law due to its failure to… [read post]