Search for: "California Company v. Price"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2013, 10:37 am
Further, the Indian courts in Colgate Palmolive Company v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Likewise, the class of purchasers harmed by a stock price drop will comprise the same members in both actions. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
Background and Procedural History The issue in Wayfair was whether South Dakota could impose a use tax collection obligation on an out-of-state company with no in-state physical presence when that company engaged in taxable transactions of goods or services to be delivered into South Dakota. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm
Pierce explained that in 1983, the Supreme Court’s MVMA v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:00 am
This assertion was made in the cases of U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm
In July 2023, PacWest had announced its plan to merge with the Bank of California. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 8:13 am
It's a rather iPhone-centric perspective, but the biggest problem here for Qualcomm is that Judge Koh ruled in GPNE Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:38 am
From a consumer point of view, prices have to come down further. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 2:59 pm
Background On December 3, 2021, the same plaintiff law firm filed two separate shareholder derivative lawsuits in the Northern District of California. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 1:47 am
Epic Games v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:47 am
The court held that the complaint failed to allege plausible harm because “[v]isitors to [the company’s] website are presented with the shipping and handling charges” during the checkout process, and because consumers unsatisfied with the S&H fees were “free to make their purchases elsewhere. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:47 am
The court held that the complaint failed to allege plausible harm because “[v]isitors to [the company’s] website are presented with the shipping and handling charges” during the checkout process, and because consumers unsatisfied with the S&H fees were “free to make their purchases elsewhere. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 5:47 am
Wang had made false statements, both online and in connection with her California lawsuit, that she (1) filed a false police report regarding her lost passport and obtained a refund from a travel insurance company for a portion of [an] airline ticket price, and (2) falsely accused Mr. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
We depart from our usual practice of hermetically sealing new and old relists to note that Bowers’ Lackey claim got some new company this week: the newly relisted Davis v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:14 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:14 am
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 11:27 am
Food Settlements There was also a fair amount of class action settlement activity in California this month: Briseño v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:27 am
United Black Fund v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 10:36 am
On Day 4 of the FTC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:12 am
Darius Sturmer, Editor of CCH Trade Regulation Reporter.A computer software company, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), and the NCAA’s licensing arm could have participated in a price fixing conspiracy or group boycott that violated federal antitrust law by not compensating current and former student-athletes for the use of their names, images, and likenesses in products such as video games and by preventing former student-athletes from participating in the… [read post]
