Search for: "California v. Jones" Results 921 - 940 of 1,312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2012, 10:03 am by Dan Gauss
Soon after, Barbara Jones became the fifth federal judge to declare the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional in the ACLU/NYCLU/Paul Weiss case Windsor v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 2:58 pm
Click here for the story, from the Dow Jones Newswires’ Kristina Peterson. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 8:38 am by Eric Goldman
However, occasionally judges simply reject Section 230 because they don’t like it (this year’s crop include Jones v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
(One point omitted is that the Supreme Court eventually ruled in the Missouri case that Judge Jones got it wrong on the preemption issue.) [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:19 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
The court referred to the seminal case of Jones v Krok 1995 (1) SA 677 (A) to set out the conditions to be met for the recognition and enforcement of a foreign judgment, namely: ‘(i) that the court which pronounced the judgment had jurisdiction to entertain the case according to the principles recognised by our law with reference to the jurisdiction of foreign courts (sometimes referred to as “international jurisdiction or competence”)? [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
The jury convicted Ayala, and the California Supreme Court affirmed. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 12:27 am
., a church in which, as the United States Supreme Court expressed it in its 1872 decision in Watson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the March 29, April 12 and April 18 conferences)   City of Newport Beach, California v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Jones’ article for the Guardian can be read here and a follow up article here. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 6:00 pm by Richard Goldfarb
In particular, this article by Melissa Jones outlines the issues in California well. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 12:45 pm by Jeremy Gillula
Jones that Americans’ location history enjoys significant privacy protections, and in Riley v. [read post]