Search for: "California v. Nevada" Results 921 - 940 of 1,111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
So medical monitoring in California doesn't appear to be a completely independent cause of action. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am by Marie Louise
(IPBiz)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC reverses DNH in Markem-Imaje Corporation v Zipher; Newman partially dissents (IPBiz) District Court Nevada: Plaintiff need not produce licenses involving unasserted patents where licenses involving patents-in-suit have been produced: Bally Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm by renholding
California and Florida are the big surprises. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:11 am by Maxwell Kennerly
" As the Nevada Supreme Court noted in 2005, there are ample cases permitting malpractice suits following a supposedly insufficient settlement: See, e.g., Durkin v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:21 am
The jury concluded late Tuesday that Microsoft willfully infringed on patents held by VirnetX, and awarded the California technology licensing company $105.8 million. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Civil WarKalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu) Boats in a Storm: Law and Displacement in Postwar South AsiaEvan Taparata, University of Pennsylvania (taparata@sas.upenn.edu) State of Refuge: Refugee Law and the Modern United StatesAdnan Zulfiqar, Rutgers Law School (adnan.zulfiqar@rutgers.edu) Collective Duties in Islamic Law: The Moral Community, State Authority, and Ethical Speculation in the late 9th to the 14th Centuries CEConvener: Reuel Schiller,… [read post]
12 Nov 2006, 11:41 am
  Would we be in this national lose-lose situation without the Court's two Bush v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 8:34 am by Lyle Denniston
  That decision, in the case of United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 1:16 pm by Edward Smith
3-Car Accident near South Lake Tahoe I’m Ed Smith and I’m a South Lake Tahoe Auto Accident Attorney. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
[but] in a general sense, the principles of comment k relate to the negligence concepts.Toner, 732 P.2d at 310-11 (various citations omitted).Toner relied heavily on then-California law, as decided by intermediate California courts, especially Kearl v. [read post]