Search for: "Case v. Taylor"
Results 921 - 940
of 3,591
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
On INFORRM Oliver Fairhurst has covered the case of Magyar Jeti Zrt v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 9:41 am
App. 1986), quoting from Minor v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 12:51 pm
” As I previously reported, today’s two consolidated cases (U.S. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
Section 4 of the ATCA specifically responds to rulings in two recent ATA cases, Waldman v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 7:07 pm
Significant cases in 2018 included the latest instalment of Moroccanoil Israel v Aldi Foods and Frucor Beverages v Coca-Cola on the registrability of colour trade marks. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 7:07 pm
Significant cases in 2018 included the latest instalment of Moroccanoil Israel v Aldi Foods and Frucor Beverages v Coca-Cola on the registrability of colour trade marks. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 7:12 am
” Taylor v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 7:12 am
” Taylor v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 8:51 am
The Honorable Judge William Fletcher Taylor-ed to a T.Menendez v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:45 am
Nelson (University of Houston), and Roberto Tallarita (Harvard Law School), on Wednesday, November 14, 2018 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm
The most recent opinion will be published case in the Southwestern Reporter:Savoy v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
Chubb Insurance Company of Canada, 2017 ABQB 413, and in Taylor & Lieberman v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 10:48 am
Taylor. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 2:44 am
"]Vineyard 29, LLC v. 29 Wine Company, LLC, Opposition No. 91227774 (October 29, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jyll Taylor) [Opposition to registration of HIGHWAY 29 for wine in view of the registered mark 29 for wine. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
If, however, an employee is to be dismissed for violating the conditions of the disciplinary probation, the appointing authority must to make certain that the actions, or omissions, cited for triggering the termination of the employee serving the disciplinary probationary period do indeed violate the specific terms or conditions enumerated in the disciplinary settlement agreement as the decision in Taylor v Cass, 122 AD2d 885, demonstrates.Taylor, a Suffolk County employee, won… [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
If, however, an employee is to be dismissed for violating the conditions of the disciplinary probation, the appointing authority must to make certain that the actions, or omissions, cited for triggering the termination of the employee serving the disciplinary probationary period do indeed violate the specific terms or conditions enumerated in the disciplinary settlement agreement as the decision in Taylor v Cass, 122 AD2d 885, demonstrates.Taylor, a Suffolk County employee, won… [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:02 am
Converse v. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 9:17 am
Facebook to Taylor v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s 2013 Shelby County v. [read post]
