Search for: "Civil Procedure & Federal Courts Blog"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,516
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2015, 10:00 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
& Serv. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:08 am
Nichol is co-author of Federal Courts; Federal Courts: Cases and Comments; and contributing author of Where We Stand: Voices of Southern Dissent. [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
Fourth, and finally, there was no constitutional right to take a deposition of a relevant federal agency under the constitution’s Full Faith & Credit Clause, and a federal statute, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 1:16 pm
That's the title of coverage of a speech by Attorney General Eric Holder posted at the Blog of Legal Times, aka, The BLT. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as co-counsel to the respondent in this case.] [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:45 am
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), Sedona Principles and that support the idea that eDiscovery is going global. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 11:01 am
It is not part of the federal bankruptcy statute, but is a matter of state law. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:15 pm
Procter & Gamble Distributing, LLC 14-958Issue: Whether Federal Rule of Evidence 702, as interpreted by Daubert v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Wong 13-1074Issue: Whether the six-month time bar for filing suit in federal court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 8:21 am
**** The information written here is not legal advice and the author of this blog is not your lawyer. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm
But there’s still plenty of room to fight back. * * * The amicus briefs submitted yesterday: Amicus Brief of Civil Procedure and Federal Courts Law Professors Amici argue that the district court’s dismissal of plaintiffs’ complaint at the motion-to-dismiss stage was based on a fundamental misapplication of federal pleading standards and should be reversed. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
It immediately removed the case to federal court under the authority of §1441(b). [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm
It’s time to put on your big-boy and big-girl pants and go into federal court. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:11 pm
Gruma removed the suit to federal district court. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 12:07 pm
Twitter appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm
Scott & Associates (sometimes SCOTT, PARNELL & ASSOCIATES, PC) and JAVITCH BLOCK, LLC. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(IP finance) Argentina Federal Civil and Commercial Court of Appeals of Buenos Aires orders Cueros Del Norte to stop using Puma’s ‘inverted pipe’ design for sports shoes (IP tango) Australia Virgin unsuccessful in opposition to ALL DAY, EVERY DAY, LOW registration by Qantas (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Speeding up procedure: IP Australia announces additional reforms (Mallesons Stephen… [read post]
25 May 2010, 6:40 am
As Shari Allison notes, over at the Federal Defender’s Tenth Circuit blog, the panel held that the state “courts and the district court failed to properly apply Beck [that] [d]epraved-mind second-degree murder was and now is a lesser-included offense of first-degree murder under Oklahoma law (the Tenth spends some time on the meanderings of the OK courts on this issue). [read post]
24 May 2007, 5:32 pm
When I taught civil procedure I would talk to students about situations I faced as a lawyer that raised ethical challenges. [read post]
