Search for: "Class Action Defense" Results 921 - 940 of 11,535
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2011, 9:16 am
To assist class action defense attorneys anticipate the types of cases against which they will have to defend in California, we provide weekly, unofficial summaries of the legal categories for new class action lawsuits filed in California state and federal courts in the Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Jose, Sacramento, San Diego, San Mateo, Oakland/Alameda and Orange County areas. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 7:12 am
As a resource to California class action defense attorneys, we provide weekly, unofficial summaries of the legal categories for new class action lawsuits filed in California state and federal courts in the Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Jose, Sacramento, San Diego, San Mateo, Oakland/Alameda and Orange County areas. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 8:42 am
To assist class action defense attorneys anticipate the types of claims against which they will have to defend in California, we provide weekly, unofficial summaries of the legal categories for new class action lawsuits filed in California state and federal courts in the Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Jose, Sacramento, San Diego, San Mateo, Oakland/Alameda and Orange County areas. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 8:58 pm
Defense attorneys removed for the class action to federal court under CAFA (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) and on the ground of federal question jurisdiction under the National Bank Act (NBA). [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 8:57 pm
Class Action Alleging Antitrust Violations on Behalf of Indirect Purchasers Failed to Satisfy Class Action Requirements of Rule 23(b)(3) because no Methodology for Establishing Class Wide Damages but Request for Class Action Certification under Rule 23(b)(2) taken under Submission California Federal Court Holds Plaintiff filed a putative class action against Apple alleging violations of federal and state antitrust laws;… [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 4:43 am
Defense attorneys removed the class action to federal court; Countrywide argued that removal was proper under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), and further argued that the class action was removable “because plaintiffs’ claims raise substantial, disputed federal questions under the Truth-in-Lending Act [(TILA)],” id., at 1. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:27 pm
We have recently learned that the class action which had been commenced in Chicago, in 2006, against Kazaa, Lewan v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 11:45 am by Bona Law PC
I can tell you, first-hand, that this briefing is monotonous for the defense side too—and probably the court. [read post]