Search for: "Coates v. Coates"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2009, 2:53 am
Thorogood v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 12:52 am
The court went back to basics by looking at the CJEU decision in L'Oreal v Bellure ECLI:EU:C:2009:378 at [50].In that case, the court said that it was all about riding on the coat-tails of a mark with a reputation by seeking to benefit from the mark's power of attraction, reputation and prestige by exploiting the marketing effort expended by the trade mark's owner without paying any form of compensation. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 5:17 pm
The elaboration that "the intent of a questioner is relevant only if it could affect a reasonable declarant's expectations" is, I think, the best way of making sense of a rather confusing aspect of the opinion in Davis v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:31 am
CUSTOMS Logo Barred by Sections 2(a) and 2(b)Section 2(b) - US Flag, Coat of Arms, or Insignia:Precedential No. 27: U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
Kenwood had its own established goodwill in kitchen appliances and did not need to ride on Whirlpool's coat-tails. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:30 am
Thorogood v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:30 am
Thorogood v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am
[Spier v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:43 am
In Matal v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 7:55 am
See Honeywell International, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 8:26 am
Fresh Coat, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:27 am
As a Legal Post article discussing Tossonian v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 3:49 am
Higgins Rack Coating and Manufacturing Co., Inc. (1969), 17 Mich.App. 259, 169 N.W.2d 326. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 10:02 pm
v=xwnJ5Bl4kLI Now, here’s a pithier review from CNETTV: www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
“I spit on those (beautiful) CONFLICT diamonds and (so … soft) EVIL fur coat! [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 12:14 pm
Second, the Colorado Court of Appeals in Coats v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:36 am
., Serial No. 77219184 [Refusal to register the mark depicted below, consisted of "the configuration of interlaced woven strips of leather forming a repeating weave pattern used over all or substantially all of the goods," for wallets, purses, and other leather goods, on the grounds of aesthetic and utilitarian functionality, mere ornamentality, and lack of acquired distinctiveness].October 5, 2011 - 2 PM: Companhia de Bebidas das Americas v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:48 am
” H-D U.S.A., LLC v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:44 am
(Delhi Cloth And General Mills Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 1:01 am
As Judge Woodrough, speaking for the Eighth Circuit, pointed out in Coates v. [read post]
