Search for: "Cole v State" Results 921 - 940 of 1,206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2011, 3:55 pm by The Editors
Court of Appeals Second Circuit’s rehearing of Arar v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:48 am by Robichaud
The threat posed by the latter is unique because “when equipped with sophisticated surveillance technologies, the state may be tempted to embark on forward-looking, ‘fishing expedition[s] in the hope of uncovering evidence of crime. [read post]
14 May 2014, 1:55 pm
 Here’s the abstract: The question presented to the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 12:45 pm
While federal district court decisions are not binding on state courts or on the Ninth Circuit, the growing acceptance of the reasoning in White v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Well, Bulgaria is in the EU and an EUTM can be blocked from registration by a national mark from any EU Member State. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
R v Plant, [1993] 3 SCR 281 at para 45; R v Tessling, 2004 SCC 67, [2004] 3 SCR 432 at para 32; R v Cole, 2012 SCC 53, [2012] 3 SCR 34 at paras 39-58; R v Patrick, 2009 SCC 17, [2009] 1 SCR 579 at para 27. 5 Supra note 4 at para 27. 6 2014 SCC 43, [2014] 2 SCR 212 at para 18. 7 Plant, supra note 4 at para 20. 8 Ibid. 9 Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11. 10 2010 SCC 55 at para 38, [2010] 3 SCR 211, per… [read post]