Search for: "Consumer Law Protection, LLC"
Results 921 - 940
of 3,696
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2020, 2:07 pm
Last week, an Ohio district court found that violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) occurring between 2015 and July 2020 cannot be enforced because the law was unconstitutional at the time. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 7:19 am
Kinect Solar, LLC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 7:04 am
Fishman, an attorney with Fortney & Scott, LLC in Washington, D.C. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 4:16 am
Constitution states: "nor shall any State ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection o f the laws. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 12:26 pm
” The authors and others at Venable have considerable experience advising clients on issues related to regulatory compliance, risk management, and other consumer protection concerns, in addition to representing clients in Lanham Act litigation and Federal Trade Commission investigations and law enforcement actions. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 6:27 am
Contact a Lancaster Job Accident Lawyer at Vanasse Law LLC to Assist You With Your Workers’ Comp Claim The workers’ comp process is complicated and time-consuming. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 6:24 am
J-B Weld Company, LLC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 6:01 am
Bush, Bush International LLC, on Sunday, October 25, 2020 Tags: Corporate purpose, Corporate Social Responsibility, Diversity, ESG, Human capital, Reputation, Shareholder primacy, Shareholder value, Stakeholders Statement by Commissioners Lee and Crenshaw on No-Action Relief for Non-Compliance with the Customer Protection Rule Posted by Allison Herren Lee and Caroline A. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 11:36 am
When it is appropriately brought, copyright law provides unique remedies and may provide recovery which might not otherwise be unlawful under trademark or consumer protection laws. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 8:49 am
., on remand from the Supreme Court, upheld its previous ruling that faxes seeking the recipient’s information are considered a “pretext” to an advertisement, and thus fall within the scope of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 8:49 am
., on remand from the Supreme Court, upheld its previous ruling that faxes seeking the recipient’s information are considered a “pretext” to an advertisement, and thus fall within the scope of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 8:49 am
., on remand from the Supreme Court, upheld its previous ruling that faxes seeking the recipient’s information are considered a “pretext” to an advertisement, and thus fall within the scope of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 2:40 am
Cyberspace.com, LLC, 453 F.3d 1196, 1200, 1201 (9 Cir. 2000). [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:56 am
NPAS Solutions, LLC, No. 18-12344, September 17, 2020). [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 11:33 am
ADB Interest, LLC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 11:20 am
Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. has petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States for certiorari following an unfavorable ruling from the Ninth Circuit in the matter of VIP Products LLC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:47 am
NPAS Solutions, LLC, the plaintiff filed a class action lawsuit under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) alleging that the defendant used an automatic telephone dialing system to call cell phones without the proper consent. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:47 am
NPAS Solutions, LLC, the plaintiff filed a class action lawsuit under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) alleging that the defendant used an automatic telephone dialing system to call cell phones without the proper consent. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:47 am
NPAS Solutions, LLC, the plaintiff filed a class action lawsuit under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) alleging that the defendant used an automatic telephone dialing system to call cell phones without the proper consent. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:55 pm
VIP Products LLC 20-365Issues: (1) Whether a commercial product using humor is subject to the same likelihood-of-confusion analysis applicable to other products under the Lanham Act, or must receive heightened First Amendment protection from trademark-infringement claims, where the brand owner must prove that the defendant’s use of the mark either is “not artistically relevant” or “explicitly misleads consumers”; and (2) whether a commercial… [read post]
