Search for: "Cooper v. California" Results 921 - 940 of 1,593
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 12:44 pm by Lorene Park
In McGrory v Applied Signal Technology, Inc, the manager declined to identify workers who had complained about the subordinate, citing privacy reasons. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Research & resources New issue of the Journal of Media Law, Volume 4, Number 2, December 2012, with numerous relevant articles, including: Irreconcilable Differences: The Attempts to Increase Media Coverage of Family Courts in England and Wales, Hanna, Mark; Public Comment on Court Proceedings, Louis Blom-Cooper; Carina Trimingham v Associated Newspapers: A Right to Ridicule? [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am by John Elwood
California "clearly establish[es]," for purposes of habeas corpus review of state-court judgments under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
Cooper to require resentencing. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm by Kali Borkoski
California "clearly establish[es]," for purposes of habeas corpus review of state-court judgments under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by James F. Aspell
10 Myths and Facts About Workers' Compensation Posted by LexisNexis Workers' Comp Law Community Staff The LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation Law Community and the award-winning blog Work Comp Roundup have teamed up to present some common myths and facts about workers’ compensation. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 8:19 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
People v Urziceanu (2005) 132 CA4th 747, 773, 33 CR3d 859. [read post]