Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 921 - 940 of 16,690
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Although the Court of Appeal was clear, in Neurim v Generics [2020] EWCA Civ 793, that deciding to uphold the lower court’s decision not to grant a pharmaceutical patent PI was based on the specific facts of that case, the Patents Court has subsequently refused two further pharmaceutical PIs (Neurim v Teva [2022] EWHC 954 (Pat) and [2022] EWHC 1641(Pat), and Novartis v Teva [2022] EWHC 959 (Ch)). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 8:56 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinion: State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:45 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
As stated, the rules require one intending to apply for asylum to first obtain an appointment. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
” In the June 2013 OECD Economic Policy Paper ‘Judicial performance and its determinants: a cross-country perspective,’ Palumbo et al. write (internal citations omitted): “Well-functioning judiciaries are a crucial determinant of economic performance. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The opposition division, however, decided that example 3 of D1 using ENGAGE® 8400 was a suitable starting point for assessing inventive step, without dealing with that argument (Reasons for the decision, page 9, lines 6-16).In the statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant preemptively dealt with the enablement of the disclosure of example 3 of D1 and submitted that D18 is cross-referenced in the paragraph bridging pages 14 and 15 of D1 as a document describing the preparation of… [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm by INFORRM
They are merely the means by which the state seeks to control – regulate, if you like – the speech of end-users. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:00 am by Unknown
(Americas Migration Brief, June 2023) [text]Case in Brief: Canadian Council for Refugees v. [read post]