Search for: "DEAL v. DEAL" Results 921 - 940 of 43,672
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2024, 7:00 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by Frank Cranmer
The conviction of Rausing aside, however, since R v Hunter in 1974 there appear to have been nine fully-reported cases of the offence in England and Wales: R v Swindell (1981) 3 Cr App R (S) 255; R v Parry and McLean (1986) 8 Cr App R (S) 470; R v Skinner (Patrick and Ian) (1993) 14 Cr App R (S) 115; R v Godward [1998] 1 Cr App R (S) 385;  R v Lang (Jack Thomas) [2001] EWCA Crim 2690, [2002] 2 Cr App R… [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:50 pm by Will Newman
I think maybe a more fitting observation (and one that Gemini noted in the Apple v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 2:56 pm by Stuart Kaplow
We have done a great deal of that work for public companies, their securities counsel, and their consultants and that work will grow exponentially under this new Final Rule as materiality appears now replaced by pages of prescriptive disclosures. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm by Giles Peaker
No prejudice to the leaseholders had been found by the FTT, pursuant to Daejan Investments Ltd v Benson (2013) UKSC 14. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
Recognizing the worst in government transparency. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
And with good reason: It does not take a tasseographer to read the tea spilled on the leaves of Justice Kavanaugh’s Allen v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 9:06 am by Eric S. Solotoff
On March 7, 2024, the unreported (non-precedential) Appellate Division decision in the case of Papetti v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:28 am by Jon Hyman
 — via The Chief Organizer Blog Google cuts team of contractors who went on strike — via The Verge Few Large Employers Have Changed Abortion Coverage Following Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 5:28 am by Jon Hyman
For example, yesterday I read the 6th Circuit’s decision in Jones v. [read post]