Search for: "DOE v. UNITED STATES" Results 921 - 940 of 44,296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On August 23, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued its long-awaited opinion in Klocke v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 12:29 pm by Federalist Society
This case presents two questions regarding the power of bankruptcy courts: One, does Article III of the Constitution permit bankruptcy courts to exercise the judicial power of the United States on the basis of litigant consent--and if so, can consent be implied by litigant conduct? [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 12:29 pm by Federalist Society
This case presents two questions regarding the power of bankruptcy courts: One, does Article III of the Constitution permit bankruptcy courts to exercise the judicial power of the United States on the basis of litigant consent--and if so, can consent be implied by litigant conduct? [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 12:52 pm by Ruthann Robson
Obama in the District Court for the District of Columbia, the petitioner relies on Monday's controversial decision by the United States Supreme Court in Burwell v.... [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:30 pm
But Macy’s skips a step; nowhere does it set forth facts that rebut the presumption of validity to which United’s copyright is entitled, and Macy’s does not even argue that it has rebutted that presumption. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:24 pm by Joseph L. Hyde
Recognizing that federal caselaw in this area is not binding, it nevertheless adopts the reasoning of the United States Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 5:35 pm by Steven G. Pearl
On October 31, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari and vacated the California Supreme Court's decision in Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:12 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which includes California, issued a ruling on March 9 that the clear and unambiguous language of RESPA Section 8(b) does not reach the practice of overcharging. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:02 am by Michael DelSignore
United States, 304 U.S. 705 (1969), the Supreme Court held the First Amendment does not protect statements a reasonable person would regard as threatening. [read post]