Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 921 - 940 of 7,395
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2016, 12:32 pm
 Rather than saying that, even though I'm outvoted, I'm going to refuse to read the brief unless I get a special one for me that complies with my particularized desires.Look, I don't like overlength briefs any more than Judge Kozinski does. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:41 am by charonqc
  This does not bode well for our ‘hallowed jury trial system’ according to an interesting article in The Guardian this morning. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:09 pm
But, again, the fact that I praise or defend candidate X does not mean I've joined their team. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 2:08 pm
"  Typically, you compare and contrast:  Rule X doesn't apply, whereas the text of Rule Y seems straightforward and governs.At the end of the opinion, Justice Sanchez tells us what period does apply. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 6:52 am
Here’s what I want to know: Does this mean that if one has a ‘trusted’ computer and/or a Vista-like ‘trusted’ OS that is designed to prevent the user from copying data without permission from Mom, that this sound card will rip it anyway? [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 4:26 pm by Bridget Crawford
 Stabbing at an answer, I’d say that an article has more background (that not-so-useful-but-unfortunately-de-rigeur-and-too-long “Part I: Overview”/background/literature review) or more complex theoretical ambitions than an essay does. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
I agree with the reader that these amounts are significant.In my response to the reader, I explained that I should have been more specific about the challenge of cutting federal spending. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 10:45 pm
My eyes were shut and I watched intently, as I always do, hoping to see something magical, which does not always occur. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 4:01 am by Andrew Frisch
It does not include an occasional suggestion with regard to the change in status of a co-worker. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:36 pm by Glenn Cohen
If your theory of personhood is about the actual possession of criteria X, on some ways to fill in “X” – such as fetal pain, which I have written about here – fetuses late in gestation may possess the criteria but not embryos as the stage they are discarded/destroyed as part of IVF or stem cell derivation. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 8:29 am by Justin P. Webb
I have copied the file and renamed it, as well as copied it and changed the extension:Notice that the hash never changes, from OS X to Windows. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 7:39 pm
  (The common logic of cross– “You just testified to X. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 7:39 pm
  (The common logic of cross– “You just testified to X. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 8:09 am by Laura C. Baucus and Samantha L. Walls
” Courts have also applied the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection’s own analysis in determining that Regulation X does not have retroactive effect. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 1:08 pm by Michael Fox
I am sitting in the airport and just saw a re-run of his latest comment - that if NBC wants to make sure he is not seen on TV for three years, they should just leave him on NBC.If in fact there's something to what Chris says, and I must admit it does have a ring of truth, it no doubt will manifest itself in ways that will end up on employment lawyers' desks all across the country, where unfortunately it won't be all that funny. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 3:24 am
It is a case of a coach imposing a new offense on a team for which he does (yet) not have the right personnel. [read post]