Search for: "Daca " Results 921 - 940 of 2,557
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2019, 4:49 pm by Immigration Prof
Is the Rescission of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Justified by the Results of Cost-Benefit Analysis by Carolina Arlota, 29 Berkeley La Raza L.J. 93 (2019). [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 5:00 am by Immigration Prof
On September 19th, a coalition of immigrant advocacy organizations released a report calling for expanding state occupational licensing programs to DACA recipients, TPS holders, and other immigrants. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:09 pm by Howard Bashman
“Ahead of DACA’s date with Supreme Court, beneficiaries of the Obama-era program are on edge; DACA recipients cite quality of healthcare, food access and physical safety in their home countries as top concerns if they are deported, according to a survey released this week”: Obed Manuel of The Dallas Morning News has this report. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 7:17 am by gA
Si uno miraba la escena con lógica cínica de monólogo de Tato Bores, la Constitución había sido estigmatizada como un contubernio, un toma y daca, alimento balanceado con intendente y tercer senador como el peaje que la UCR cobró para habilitar la reelección de Menem.Había eso, incluso negociaciones "a lo turco", pero hubo mucho más que eso.Enter la leyenda rosa. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:19 pm by Kalvis Golde
The Heritage Foundation will also host a preview of major cases in the upcoming Supreme Court term on issues including the Affordable Care Act, DACA, Title VII, religious school funding and the Second Amendment. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:00 am by Melissa Crow
Yet only individuals who entered the U.S. by 2007 are eligible for DACA. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 9:00 am by Elizabeth Murrill
The federal government should prevail in the DACA cases for one straightforward reason: DACA is unlawful. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:31 am by Kalvis Golde
Montana Department of Revenue, and a group of cases concerning the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA, consolidated under Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:20 pm by Immigration Prof
SCOTUSBlog is running a symposium on the DACA case that will soon be argued. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 11:30 am by Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia
DACA has a strong legal foundation. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 8:28 am by Chris Hajec
The second obligation means that, even if the plaintiffs “win” on rescission, the Supreme Court cannot reinstate DACA – if DACA is unlawful. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 12:43 pm by Dayna Zolle and Brianne Gorod
DACA is therefore lawful — just like the various deferred-action programs that preceded it. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am by Adam Feldman
Kansas DACA and the nondelegation doctrine in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:11 am by Bob Ambrogi
An app rolled out in one day in Spanish and English that helped DACA recipients understand how they were affected by President Trump’s revocation announcement. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 12:06 pm by Amy Howe
The Trump administration’s decision to end DACA was also “based on the flawed premise that DACA is unlawful. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 2:02 pm by Katie Bart
ET, the State and Local Legal Center and National Association of Counties will host a webinar with Michael Dreeben, former deputy solicitor general; Joe Palmore, appellate and Supreme Court practice group co-chair and managing partner at Morrison Foerster; and Todd Ruger, legal affairs staff writer at CQ Roll Call, to discuss salient cases for state and local government during the upcoming Supreme Court term on the Second Amendment, DACA, Bridgegate, copyright, school choice, and more. [read post]