Search for: "Defenders of Wildlife" Results 921 - 940 of 1,420
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2011, 8:46 am by Christopher Wright
Defenders of Wildlife, in which the Court held that Congress could not create a “citizen’s suit” to enforce the Endangered Species Act. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:18 pm by Steve Davies
It does indeed have an “r”) Beluga whale management and recovery (more links than you can shake a stick at) Beluga whale research and reports Notice of intent to prepare recovery plan (75 FR 4528, January 28, 2010) Defenders of Wildlife’s beluga page [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:28 am by Christopher Wright
  If successful, class members would receive three times the amount that they paid for title insurance, up to a cap of $500,000 or one percent of the defendant’s net value. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:04 pm by Brad Pauley
Defenders of Wildlife (1992) 504 U.S. 555, 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 [“injury in fact” for purposes of Article III standing requires the “invasion of a legally protected interest which is concrete and particularized”].) [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 1:15 pm by WIMS
The Appeals Court indicates that Plaintiff-Appellant Rock Creek Alliance appealed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee the U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:12 pm by Steve Davies
USFWS, 10-35596): “Plaintiff-Appellant Rock Creek Alliance appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee the U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:49 am
Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992) (internal citations omitted): First, the plaintiff must have suffered an “injury in fact”– an invasion of a legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized and (b) “actual or imminent, not `conjectural’ or `hypothetical. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 1:41 pm by WIMS
"     Jamie Rappaport Clark, president and CEO for Defenders of Wildlife said, "The Obama administration made the wise decision to protect vast tracts of the country's oceans from oil and gas exploration. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 1:38 pm by WIMS
Plaintiffs-Appellants Ark Initiative, et al appeal from the district court's judgment in favor of the Defendants-Appellees, the U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
As noted above, the courts have routinely found the victim depicted was harmed by the offender’s possession of the images depicting their abuse.16 Despite the consistency among the courts in finding harm to the victims, the courts have split on whether, and how much restitution to award the victims depicted in the imagery; amounts vary between full restitution,17 de minimus restitution,18 and no restitution.19 The difference in outcome turns on the courts’ causation… [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:50 am by Steve Davies
Defenders of Wildlife senior attorney Jason Rylander, who filed an amicus brief on behalf of Defenders, the Institute for Fisheries Resources, and the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, had this to say: “Six times now, the Supreme Court has rebuffed radical special interest attacks on the constitutionality of the Endangered Species Act. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 9:40 am by Brooke
If you are unable to produce the required documents you will likely be cited requiring you to appear in court to defend yourself. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:43 pm by Steve Davies
” Organic Act and Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act “Under MUSYA’s statutory scheme, which supplemented the broad authority granted in the Organic Act, Congress clearly authorized the Forest Service to regulate [National Forest System] lands for multiple uses, including those protected by the Roadless Rule, such as ‘outdoor recreation,’ ‘watershed,’ and ‘wildlife and fish purposes. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
Intervening Environmental Groups include the Biodiversity Conservation Alliance; Defenders of Wildlife; National Audubon Society; Natural Resources Defense Council; Pacific Rivers Council; Sierra Club; Wilderness Society; and Wyoming Outdoor Council. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:51 am
Offenses involving fish, wildlife and plants are discussed, in detail, in section 2Q2.1. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 1:39 pm by WIMS
Oct 17: In response to a challenge brought by the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD), Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Greenpeace and Defenders of Wildlife, a Federal judge struck down a Bush administration rule that exempted greenhouse gas emissions from regulation under provisions of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:29 pm by Steve Davies
District Judge Emmet Sullivan concluded that the Fish and Wildlife Service violated NEPA by not preparing at least an initial assessment of its 4(d) rule for the polar bear. [read post]