Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 921 - 940
of 8,958
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2013, 4:13 pm
As this does not amount to clear and convincing evidence of the victim's age, 20 points should not have been assessed. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 10:34 am
Although the defendant asserts that this application is brought pursuant to Correction Law §168-o(2), this subdivision does not afford the defendant a procedural vehicle through which such relief may be sought as it only provides for the modification of the level of notification. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:58 pm
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, October 20, 2008 US v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 2:25 pm
The Court finds that defendant does have standing to challenge the search warrant. [read post]
Aggravating Factors in Felony Speeding to Elude Statute Are Elements for Purposes of Double Jeopardy
10 Apr 2014, 3:00 am
The two factors found by the jury in Mulder were (1) speeding more than 15 miles per hour over the legal speed limit and (2) reckless driving as proscribed by G.S. 20-140. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 8:50 am
Jan. 20, 2015) and S.W. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:52 am
G.S. 20-179(a1) (2). [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:34 am
The defendant retired from the NYPD in 2003, after 20 years of service, and he began collecting his pension. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:03 am
Lewis of Pence and MacMillan LLC, Laramie, Wyoming.Date of Decision: January 20, 2011Facts: This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted to the defendant in a worker’s compensation co-employee liability suit.Appellant and Appellee were employed by a mining company. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 7:13 am
This said, the judge quickly considered the two last requirements of Section 97A CDPA and concluded that (1) both users and the operators of the websites in issue used the Defendants' services to infringe the Claimants' copyrights, and (2) the Defendants had actual knowledge that users and the operators of the Websites use the Defendants' services to infringe copyright. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:16 am
And then the court does . . . nothing. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am
App. 1, 13, 707 S.E.2d 724, 733 (2011). [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 1:33 pm
The District Court decided Evanston had no duty to defend. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 6:21 pm
The prosecutor articulated it as such: In the instant case, the offense of conviction, misprision of felony, requires proof that: "1) the principal committed and completed the alleged felony; 2) defendant had full knowledge of that fact; 3) defendant failed to notify the authorities; and 4) defendant took steps to conceal the crime. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
Reg. 8334 (Feb. 20, 2003). [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
Baird, No. 1:20-cv-11579-DJC, at 7–8 (D.D.C. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
Baird, No. 1:20-cv-11579-DJC, at 7–8 (D.D.C. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 6:19 am
Spencer, No. 05-2827 (3/1/07) is a habeas case. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:43 am
Trump can plausibly defend these charges by arguing that he lacked criminal intent because he truly believed that massive voter fraud had taken place. [read post]
