Search for: "Doe v. Department of Health & Human Services" Results 921 - 940 of 1,471
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2015, 12:00 pm by Greene LLP
Attorney’s Office for the District of Delaware, the Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General, the U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Department of Health and Human Services, (3d Cir., Feb. 11, 2015), the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the Obama administration's accommodation under the Affordable Care Act for religious non-profits that object to furnishing contraceptive coverage. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
The complaint, in its preliminary statement, asserts that defendants (the Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of the Department of the Treasury, and other Executive Branch officials) are “directing, paying, and continuing to pay, public funds to certain insurance companies to implement a program authorized by the ACA, but for which no funds have been appropriated. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:20 pm
(Arkansas Department of Correction via AP) Eric Rassbach from the Becket Fund — the public interest law firm that on Tuesday won the Holt v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:15 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Steve Vladeck discusses the amicus brief that he filed on behalf of former officials of the Department of Health and Human Services in Armstrong v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 6:41 am by Darius Whelan
  Ireland is not directly tackling the problem of the "Bournewood gap" and ECHR case-law such as H.L. v UK; Stanev v Bulgaria; D.D. v Lithuania and other cases.RecommendationThe IMHLA recommends that the Bill should state that if a person is being admitted to any residential centre, this can only occur on a voluntary basis, where the person has capacity to consent to such admission and does consent to such admission. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 10:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
Companies should also consider including both a Human Resources representative and a Finance Department designee on the IRT to anticipate and address issues that may arise after the incident. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:58 am by Joel O'Malley
Regulations promulgated by the Departments of the Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services further support employer-sponsored wellness plans. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:17 am
She writes: Section 1401 can still be read literally because the section that authorizes the federal exchanges, Section 1321, provides that if a state does not establish an exchange under Section 1311, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) “shall . . . establish and operate such Exchange within the State. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
For example, the cities of Aspen and Boulder and the city and County of Denver each had enacted ordinances which banned discrimination in many transactions and activities, including housing, employment, education, public accommodations, and health and welfare services. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 4:19 pm by Steven Boutwell
They are composed of substances that can cause immediate and long-term harm to human, health and protection of public health and must take precedence over the industry’s desire to keep such information secret. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:45 am by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
The Department of Health and Human Services responded: the fact that a state law allows an individual to file [a civil action] to protect privacy does not conflict with the HIPAA penalty provisions (While the Department’s view is not binding, the Court noted that “[w]here an agency has authoritatively interpreted its own rule, courts generally defer to that reading unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:48 am by Abbe Gluck
The IRS’s interpretation accomplishes that goal: Section 1401 can still be read literally because the section that authorizes the federal exchanges, Section 1321, provides that if a state does not establish an exchange under Section 1311, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) “shall . . . establish and operate such Exchange within the State. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:15 pm by Edward A. Fallone
  Under the provisions of the Affordable Care Act, the Department of Health and Human Services requires employers to provide health insurance plans making contraception available to their female employees at no cost. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 8:59 am
We conclude that, to the extent that Connecticut’s common law provides a remedy for a health care provider’s breach of its duty of confidentiality in the course of complying with a subpoena, HIPAA does not preempt the plaintiff’s state common-law causes of action for negligence or negligent infliction of emotional distress against the health care providers in this case and, further, that regulations of the Department of Health and… [read post]