Search for: "Does 1 - 75" Results 921 - 940 of 4,941
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2008, 11:31 am
See 1 Higgins, sec. 13.II.A, at 773-75 (citing cases). [read post]
13 May 2014, 1:08 pm
It does not require that the person that you send the communication to is the same person that you intend to harass, annoy and alarm. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:17 am by Paul M. Rashkind
He was convicted and sentenced to 75 months in prison, including a consecutive 24 month enhancement required 1029A(a)(1). [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 6:00 am by Tad Lunger
  The station (projected to be a 450,000 SF facility) is planned around a 30,000 to 38,000 SF public plaza that will be framed by retail to serve the surrounding neighborhoods, and will provide an additional 75 to 100 spaces of retail parking. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 10:01 am by Jamie Markham
Suppose a prior conviction level II defendant is convicted of one Class A1 crime and two Class 1’s. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 2:00 am by Marc Roark
  Though the list of law journals is short (list below), it does pack a punch. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 2:15 am by Carol Wilkinson
Mr Durkin’s appeal was refused and it was found that s 75(1) of the CAA did not permit Mr Durkin to rescind the credit agreement. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 7:00 am by Nedim Malovic
In a recent decision concerning the likelihood of confusion between the EU collective trade mark ‘HALLOUMI’ and the sign ‘BBQLOUMI’, the EU General Court held that – in light of the similarity between the signs, the goods and services, and the distinctive character of the former mark – there was no likelihood of confusion pursuant to Articles 8(1)(b) and 75 – 82 of Regulation 2017/1001 (the EU trade mark regulation (EUTMR)).This decision… [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 11:10 am by Michelle C. Laubin
  The IEP specified that the placement would be in "District 75", the city's special education district, but did not name a school. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 10:44 am by Caroline Gentry
Sundowner Offshore Servs., Inc., 523 U.S. 75 (1998), which “clarified that it makes no difference if the sex of the harasser is (or is not) the same as the sex of the victim. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Penal Law § 260.10 (1) provides that a person endangers the welfare of a child when "[h]e knowingly acts in a manner likely to be injurious to the physical, mental or moral welfare of a child less than seventeen years old. [read post]