Search for: "Does 1-18" Results 921 - 940 of 22,462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2012, 11:01 am by oliver randl
However, the disclaimer of claim 1 does not exclude the polypeptides the sequence of which has at least 50% similarity with the sequence of 424 amino acids of figure 1 of document D1 or with any part of this sequence and which are capable of binding to IL-13 with low affinity. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm by Guest Author
”[1] And today, a small group of some of the world’s most powerful corporations exercise complete control over that public square. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 9:58 pm
It does not include recent changes made to Chapters 17, 18 and 19 of the AML/CTF Rules. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 8:56 am by Teresa Walrod
” 2019 01 10 order denying stay UPDATE (Background materials): 1 complaint 15 motion to dismiss count ii 18 response 19 reply 23 dct order granting 15 28 george motion for summary judgment 32 response 34 reply 40 us motion to stay 41 amended motion [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 10:33 am by J
But he does go on to note the decision in McHale v Cadogan [2010] 1 EGLR 51, at [17], where Rix LJ held that it was “… the policy of the authorities not to bring within the general words of a service charge clause anything that does not clearly belong there. [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 10:33 am by J
But he does go on to note the decision in McHale v Cadogan [2010] 1 EGLR 51, at [17], where Rix LJ held that it was “… the policy of the authorities not to bring within the general words of a service charge clause anything that does not clearly belong there. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:38 am by Ravi S. Nagi
Based on these definitions and conditions, a parent can take FMLA leave to care for a son or daughter who is 18 or older, if the adult son or daughter: (1) has a disability as defined by the ADA; (2) is incapable of self-care due to that disability; (3) has a serious health condition; and (4) is in need of care due to the serious health condition An eligible employee is entitled to FMLA-protected leave to care for their adult son or daughter only when all four requirements are… [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 9:36 am by Christopher McKinney
But Babb argues that Gross does not apply in cases against the federal government:However, the ADEA’s federal-sector provision is worded differently from its private-sector counterpart. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
” The proposed amendments, if adopted in the current legislative session, would go into effect on August 1, 2024. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:48 am by Marcel Pemsel
In an earlier decision of 18 February 2021 (30 W (pat) 806/18), the Court mentioned that this date can not only be changed at any time, but even be backdated (see also Board of Appeal, R 1213/2019-3 at para 32). [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:11 pm
Watkins Motor Lines, Inc., 18 AD Cases 641 (6th Cir. 2006), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals stated that morbid obesity alone does not constitute a physical impairment that an employer could regard as substantially limiting a major life activity. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 2:12 am
Advisory Committee Note, Federal Rules of Evidence 803(1). [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 6:03 am
§ 18-5-211 subsection (1) of this section or subsection (2) or (3) of this section is a class 5 felony [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Law):Mohd Rameez Raza & Raj Shekhar, The Hagia Sophia Decision: Does It Stand the Test of 'Rule of Law'? [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 2:34 pm
It says:35.2 (1) In this Part, except in section 38, a requirement that a person take an action in the presence of another person, or while other persons are present at the same time, is satisfied while the persons are in each other's electronic presence.(2) For certainty, nothing in this section prevents some of the persons described in subsection (1) from being physically present and others from being electronically present when the action is taken.(3) If a will-maker and… [read post]