Search for: "Does 1-41"
Results 921 - 940
of 4,617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2018, 9:43 am
See page 41 of the Judgment.CommentsThe Court of Appeal rightly identified the elements that must be proved in an action for trademark infringement. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:28 am
See page 41 of the Judgment.CommentsThe Court of Appeal rightly identified the elements that must be proved in an action for trademark infringement. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:52 am
The Provisions are intended to achieve the following: 1. [read post]
31 May 2018, 12:00 pm
Boundary Disputes in the European Field of Asylum Administration," Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, vol. 43, suppl. 1 (May 2018)"Fighting Human Smuggling or Criminalizing Refugees? [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 3:04 pm
Here, as Jack notes, Congress agreed in effect to waive any approval rights by setting the Iran Deal up so that the President could prevail so long as he was able to maintain 1/3+1 support in either the House or Senate (or could, by virtue of the support of 41 senators, prevent the matter from ever coming to a vote in the Senate at all). [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:33 am
The sidebar was held from 12:02:47 to 12:10:41 p.m., and during that sidebar, Agent Morse sent 4 text messages and received 4 text messages. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:25 am
1-800-579-9864. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 1:33 pm
As a result, APCo recorded a pretax write-off of $41 million ($26 million net of tax) in the first quarter of 2011. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 12:20 pm
Trial Rule 41(E). [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
During oral arguments in the Fifth Circuit, Judge Engelhardt framed this problem in a colorful way (at 1:34:40): Judge Engelhardt: Why does Congress want the Article III judiciary to become the taxidermist for every legislative big game accomplishment that Congress achieves? [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 1:37 am
The board's power to examine inventive step for claim 1 of the granted patent and claim 1 of the first to fourth auxiliary requests, and the scope of any such power5.1 No remittal to the department of first instanceThe foregoing examination of the appeal has revealed that it is allowable within the meaning of Article 111(1) EPC. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 8:26 am
The Opinion im Movic seems to continue this tendency: The following considerations were taken into account: (1) what does the nature of interests of the public authority to issue its request to the court need or not need to be (paras. 24 et seq.); (ii) in what way does the authority’s powers of investigation influence the analysis (paras. 48 et seq.), and (iii) whether the authority is granted special powers not available to private persons (here in particular the… [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:09 pm
It therefore asked for a preliminary ruling on this question: ‘Does Article 5(1) of [Directive 92/100], now Article 6(1) of [Directive [2006/115], …, preclude a national provision which sets the remuneration at a flat rate of [EUR] 1 per adult per year and of [EUR] 0.5 per minor per year? [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
Hulu – valid: Claims 1–3, 23, and 24 not anticipated; Claims 1–6, 8–11, 13–15, 17–20, 23–25, 29–31, 34–36, and 38–41 not obvious. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 6:18 am
at ¶ 41 (alleging only that `there are thousands of consumers . . .who have been damaged by Defendants' wrongful conduct,’ without specifying how or when their respective downloads occurred). [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Does 1-41 (Austin, TX)Foundation v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Rees, No. 07-5439 Kentucky's lethal injection protocol used as its method of execution does not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishments. [read post]
22 May 2016, 6:06 pm
Resolution Trust Corp., 511 U.S. 531, 540-41 (1994) (emphasis mine)The decision was 7-1, but the dissent did not go into the common law definition of "Actual Fraud. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 12:35 am
"The answer is yes, as this table by Coleman shows:............Minimum............number of........Actual BCS..................................Participants withYear.....violations........participants................................MinV adjustments1998.....41...................Tennessee, Florida St...................Tennessee (1), Florida St. (2)1999.....58...................Florida St., Va. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 6:37 am
First, there is no clear definition for effective enforcement (41(1) TRIPs). [read post]
