Search for: "Edwards v. California"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,012
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Ars Technica), Google, GE join forces for green tech research, lobbying: (Ars Technica), AIPPI Congress: how to protect you IP rights in virtual worlds (Managing Intellectual Property), Industry still wary of ICANN plan for new top-level internet domains: (Intellectual Property Watch), Ubuntu-Firefox EULA dustup reignites OSS licensing debate: (Ars Technica), Media standard backers attempt Apple-less solo run: (Out-Law), Open Source in Mobile conference: OpenMoko CEO says embrace fragmentation,… [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 3:36 am
Some of the most significant results came out of California, where voters chose to recall the progressive San Francisco District Attorney, Chesa Boudin. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 3:33 pm
In the July 29, 2022 edition of The Legal Intelligencer, Edward T. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Bingham, Daniel Bodansky, Edward Z. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Motz, to felony obstruction of justice charges and violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships related to concealing deliberate vessel pollution from the M/V Iorana, a Greek flagged cargo ship that made port calls in Baltimore, Tacoma, Wash., and New Orleans. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
(Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:21 pm
Class V. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
, I am including as well Edward B. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
The dichotomous state-versus-federal model, which Anna Law rightly links to Edward Corwin’s influential mid-twentieth-century concept of “dual federalism,” simply doesn’t apply to this earlier period. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:52 pm
Trump, California v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
ExxonMobil is asking the Texas Supreme Court to allow it to use the law, known as rule 202, to pursue legal action against more than a dozen California municipal officials. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:20 am
Edward J. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 2:16 pm
JUNE • Miranda v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 2:02 am
For example, in Intel Corp v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
• Edward J. [read post]
8 May 2023, 2:29 pm
Jack also interviewed me on his blog about my books Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom and The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
• Edward J. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Haldeman (about Watergate); California Lt. [read post]
