Search for: "Employment Development Department for State of California" Results 921 - 940 of 2,276
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2013, 8:30 pm by Kristin Bergman
California, Illinois, Michigan, Washington, and more have followed suit. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:18 am by Daniel Schwartz
Already, Maryland and California passed new laws prohibiting employers from seeking Facebook passwords. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 10:02 am by Daniel Seitz
Multi-state telecommuting may require an employer to consult with legal, tax, and other professionals in both jurisdictions. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 1:18 pm by Robert McKennon
Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones marked his first full year in office this week by looking back on the California Department of Insurance’s (CDI) major accomplishments during 2011. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 6:48 pm by Bryn Miller
It’s unclear, however, how the California Employment Development Department would handle the situation. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 11:27 am by AALRR
  The DFEH press release, available here, states "[t]he partnership's goals are closely aligned with the department's mission to train future professionals to investigate and resolve employment discrimination complaints and to develop a pipeline for students interested in serving the state with the DFEH and other related state agencies. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 10:26 am by EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.
According to the California Department of Industrial Relations, the template and related materials should be available in mid-December 2011 on its website. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 1:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
California Previously, California followed the federal treatment of net operating losses (NOLs), allowing uncapped carryforwards for 20 years. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
A nearly $2 million settlement agreement with a California-based government contractor announced January 15, 2014 by the U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 2:37 pm by Karin Johnson
The District of Columbia recently joined twelve other states[1] that have enacted laws requiring employers to accommodate certain limitations associated with pregnancy. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 3:09 pm by Kristi Thomas and Robert Foster
One area that Cal/OSHA has indicated it will address in its guidance is the interaction between the ETS and the California Department of Public Health’s (“CDPH”) recently updated isolation and quarantine guidance. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:57 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Supporters of a change cite a survey conducted by the California Department of Housing and Community Development that found that nearly half of businesses report that the credit “never” or “rarely” influenced their hiring decisions, yet businesses are still collecting tax dollars from the state. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 1:58 pm by Lawrence Taylor
For example, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) states that a failure to follow all traffic laws could potentially disqualify a person from employment. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 2:52 am
 The New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development describes the Workers Compensation system as a “no fault” insurance program that provides the following benefits to employees who suffer job-related injuries or illnesses: Medical Benefits Temporary Total Benefits  Permanent Partial Benefits  Permanent Total Benefits; and Death Benefits to dependants of workers who have died as a… [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 2:52 am
 The New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development describes the Workers Compensation system as a “no fault” insurance program that provides the following benefits to employees who suffer job-related injuries or illnesses: Medical Benefits Temporary Total Benefits  Permanent Partial Benefits  Permanent Total Benefits; and Death Benefits to dependants of workers who have died as a… [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:16 pm by Paul Cowie and Krista S. Johnson
  This week, four California lawmakers, including two San Jose Assembly members, introduced an “Opportunity to Work” bill in the California Assembly that would apply to employers across the state. [read post]
Department of Labor, however, have developed a de minimis rule, whereby employers may disregard insubstantial or insignificant periods of time beyond the scheduled working hours, if, as a practical administrative matter, such time cannot be precisely recorded. [read post]