Search for: "English v. English"
Results 921 - 940
of 11,206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2008, 9:27 am
Scope and Myths of Roe v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 12:00 am
In Easterly v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 3:23 pm
SEC v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 11:22 pm
There is a substantial body of English case law explaining the import of a contrast between different aggregation clauses. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:01 am
By Lane V. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 11:11 am
Today the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Golan v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 2:53 am
The Champions League final is May 21, Chelsea v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 4:31 am
For a link to the panel decision, Lautsi v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 9:03 am
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KD530 .P83Jeffrey Gilbert, Jeffrey Gilbert on Property and Contract v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 6:31 am
In Hrvatska Elektroprivreda v Slovenia [ICSID Case No ARB/05/24 (6 May 2008)] the defendant, in an arbitration before the International Centre for the Settlement of Investments Disputes (ICSID) waited until one week before a substantive hearing, to disclose to the tribunal and the claimant, a list of lawyers who would be attending. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 1:28 am
The case of Tryggingarfelagio Foroyar P/F v CPT Empresas Maritimas S.A. [2011] EWHC 589 (Admlty) concerned whether the agreement between the claimant's insured and the defendant was subject to a set of standard terms which incorporated an English arbitration clause. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 8:21 am
In a landmark decision in the case of Okpabi and others v Royal Dutch Shell Plc and Another, the United Kingdom Supreme Court (“UKSC”) ruled on a jurisdictional issue on whether the claimants/appellants have an arguable case that the defendants/respondents – Royal Dutch Shell (an English domiciled company) – owed them a common law duty of care so as properly to found jurisdiction against a foreign subsidiary company (Shell Petroleum Development Corporation… [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 11:10 pm
V 2 b NYC. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 12:46 pm
Those involved in debates on statutory interpretation should make themselves familiar with his case comment on Pepper v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:37 pm
But as the recent decision of the English High Court in Chantiers de l’Atlantique S.A. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm
But as the recent decision of the English High Court in Chantiers de l’Atlantique S.A. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
On Friday, I posted the complaint for BIA v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:22 am
Earlier this month, His Honor Judge Hacon (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) issued his ruling in Fromageries Bel SA v J Sainsbury Plc [2019] EWHC 3454 (Ch), confirming the 'Babybel cheese' 3D trade mark could not survive an application for a declaration of invalidity. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 6:47 am
But Holst had wide interests and sympathies, not least sharing V-W's affection for English folk songs and dances, and for reviving the music of old English composers, and those interests come together on this recording. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 10:44 am
See, e.g., Ex parte Hennen, 38 U.S. (13 Pet.) 230, 259-60 (1839); accord PCAOB v. [read post]
