Search for: "English v. State" Results 921 - 940 of 6,401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am by AIDAN WILLS MATRIX
In the context of these applications, the fact of and reasons for his arrest were stated in open court. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:53 pm by INFORRM
In relation to the harassment claim, the Court adopted the summary of the law from the English case of Dowson v Chief Constable of Northumbria ([2010] EWHC 2612 [142]). [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 3:00 am by Matthew Wentworth-May
Lord Sumption rejected this, stating that the directives leave various matters to member states to determine, but the domestic schemes were nonetheless part of a scheme for implementing an EU tax. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 1:22 am
The latter part of the presentation covered recent cases on medicines regulation, focussing on R(Roche Registration Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health [2015] EWCA Civ 1311 (although this English Court of Appeal decision was handed down on 21 December 2015, it may have escaped your radar due to seasonal festivities and/or the mad rush to tie up loose ends before the Christmas vacation...) [read post]
The judgment is clear that what is to be judged objectively is not the defendant’s actions but his subjective state of mind. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Ratification was advised by the Senate of the United States of America on June 21, 1976. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
  from: www.fromrussia.com Where licensee had licensed “Russian language only” or “English language only” rights to distribute Russian language films in the United States, could the licensor claim copyright infringements over production of DVDs with multilingual functionality? [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 2:25 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The aim of the Judgments Regulation is to prevent parallel proceedings between courts of different Member States. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 10 provides that all documents submitted by the Requesting State shall be translated into the language of the Requested State. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:08 pm by INFORRM
Anonymity The Judge began his judgment by stating the “general rule” that the names of the parties to an action should be included in the orders and judgments of the Court. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 3:09 am
The IPKat's informant fills the gap as follows:"In its judgment of 28 January 2010, the Brussels court of appeal has referred questions to the ECJ in the framework of the appeal in Sabam v Tiscali (which was well reported at the time it was issued in 2007; an English translation is available here). [read post]