Search for: "FELTS v. STATE"
Results 921 - 940
of 5,847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2007, 6:44 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 4:54 am
State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
" Further, as the decision in Walton v New York State Department of Correctional Servs., 25 AD3d 999, modified, 8 NY3d at 191, notes, "an individual is not required to exhaust the available administrative remedy where such action would constitute an exercise in futility. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 5:13 am
Herndon (1927), Nixon v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
" Further, as the decision in Walton v New York State Department of Correctional Servs., 25 AD3d 999, modified, 8 NY3d at 191, notes, "an individual is not required to exhaust the available administrative remedy where such action would constitute an exercise in futility. [read post]
15 May 2010, 8:21 am
In Matter of Cunney v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:48 am
In the case of Falcon Farms v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 9:06 pm
Piszczek v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:00 pm
In Hofmann v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 8:54 am
.), (C.L.S.) v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:29 am
Last year’s went to the victim in State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 1:15 am
Over the years of this Apple v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:09 pm
We also felt that way while we were involved in the Fagan v. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 8:58 am
From the Indiana Lawyer, an article on the recent Indiana Supreme Court decision:The state's eminent domain statute allows Indiana municipalities to acquire operations of privately owned water and sewer utilities that serve recently annexed portions of that community, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled today.The split 3-2 decision came in Utility Center, Inc., d/b/a Aquasource v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 9:46 am
Souratgar v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 5:39 pm
TunneyThe case of R. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:10 am
It felt like I’d stepped into the pages of a Kafka novel. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 2:53 am
The High Court had felt bound by Court of Appeal jurisprudence to hold that English law was applicable, but granted a leapfrog appeal certificate to the Supreme Court. [read post]
