Search for: "FRENCH v. STATE" Results 921 - 940 of 3,098
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
Today, the Second Chamber of the General Court handed over two interesting judgments (cases T-426/11 and T-412/11, Maharishi Foundation Ltd. v OHIM), which provide useful guidance on the evaluation of the descriptive character of a sign, as well as on the notion of relevant public, in relation to a word sign whose meaning can be easily understood by consumers residing in different member states, due to its closeness to equivalent expressions in other national languages. [read post]
22 May 2009, 4:10 am
The parties should also consider the guidance given by Arden LJ in Horvath v Secretary of State for Environment [2007] EWCA Civ 620 at [80]. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
 Being unsure whether allowing exploitation of works without prior permission from the relevant rightholder is permitted, the French Council of State has just sought guidance from the CJEU. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
Lucy, an African American graduate student, enrolled at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, pursuant to a court order in the case of Lucy v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Marie Taglioni in La SylphideThe Paris Commercial Court goes two for two with today’s case of the day, L’Institute National De L’Audiovisuel v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 11:32 pm by Administrator
It argues that the state cannot be held liable for anything done in the exercise of legislative power. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 6:47 am by Erin Miller
Jaffe and New York Times v. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 6:11 am by Mikhaila Fogel
VanLandingham dug into the Edward Gallagher case and former Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Law):Neil Weinstock Netanel, Introduction to: From Maimonides to Microsoft: The Jewish Law of Copyright Since the Birth of Print, (Oxford University Press 2016).Asim Jusic, SAS v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 8:32 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: CHRISTOPHER HARIGNORDOQUY v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 7:05 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
The current Rules and Regulations of the National Parks already states that “[v]isitors [which] are engaged in filming/photography intended for their personal use and enjoyment” are “generally” not required to have a permit. [read post]
4 May 2022, 6:33 am
From "1,000+ people rally in Downtown Madison to protest seemingly-imminent overturn of Roe v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm by Emily Dai
Timothy Edgar discussed how judges should follow the technical approach laid out in Van Buren v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 1:28 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Helen Klein Murillo
Jordan Brunner and Amira Mikhail summarized the Fourth Circuit’s opinion in IRAP v. [read post]