Search for: "Fair v. Poole"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,034
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2009, 6:09 am
Editor's Note: James Morphy is a partner at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP specializing in mergers & acquisitions and corporate governance. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 4:52 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
" The corporate form can raise significant problems for both types of firms.Mahler: Your book points out that, prior to the Industrial Revolution, when the need for centralized management, limited liability and large pools of capital spurred the rise of the corporation, business associations in the United States were dominated by the partnership and joint stock company, whose management structure and flexibility are more akin to the modern limited liability company. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:26 am
The Eighth Circuit's decision in Braden v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 6:12 pm
V. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 10:37 am
" Patton v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 12:25 pm
V. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:14 pm
The case is Jones v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 9:32 am
Here is the abstract: Underlying Rand J's judgment in Roncarelli v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) US Copyright Radio ‘pay to play’ law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica) US Copyright – Decisions District Court N D California decision… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) US Copyright Radio 'pay to play' law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica) US Copyright - Decisions District Court N D California decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Arkanoc Solutions, Inc… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) US Copyright Radio 'pay to play' law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica) US Copyright - Decisions District Court N D California decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Arkanoc Solutions, Inc… [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:42 am
A decision in the Ohio case, Smith v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 4:30 am
In the first case, Weeks Marine, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 7:31 am
§2254, when it rejected Smith's fair cross-section claim and that it correctly analyzed this case using the comparative-disparity test. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
In this case, the Michigan Supreme Court found no violation of that requirement when a jury pool had a 6 percent black representation, compared to a 7.28 percent share of the population in the community where the case was tried. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:45 am
Gause v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:32 pm
Standard of ReviewTrial courts have always been afforded broad discretion in the granting of new trials, and may exercise such discretion “in the interests of justice and fairness” without stating any other reason. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
" Fair enough. [read post]
