Search for: "German v. State" Results 921 - 940 of 3,581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2020, 12:01 pm by Joy Waltemath
However, the court did rule that the plaintiffs adequately justified their narrow request for jurisdictional discovery (Bradley v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am by Dave Maass
“The organization was treating its scan of Nefertiti like a state secret,” Wenman wrote in Reason. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am by Dave Maass
“The organization was treating its scan of Nefertiti like a state secret,” Wenman wrote in Reason. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 1:06 am by Florian Mueller
And those submissions present a distorted picture, for the reasons stated above.In this post I'll focus only on the proportionality of injunctions, not on other aspects of the reform bill that the submissions touch on, except where there is an inevitable overlap.Submissions in favor of major improvement over the status quo (i.e., fewer injunctions)Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition: That one is fantastic. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am by Eleonora Rosati
 Readers might for instance recall the recent judgment in Sekmadienis Ltd v Lithuania [Katpost here], in which the ECtHR considered that a prohibition to use in advertising the image of Jesus and Mary on grounds of public morals should be regarded as an undue compression of the applicants' own freedom of expression under Article 10 ECHR. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:21 am by Riana Harvey
Last week marked the end of a lengthy battle between Tulliallan Burlington (‘Tulliallan’), proprietor of the high class shopping arcade in central London, ‘Burlington Arcade’, and German Fashion GmbH (‘BF’). [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 1:59 am by Sophie Corke
Haier at the German Federal Court of Justice, which could result in the standardisation of SEP/FRAND in Germany. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
Julia Reda failed to disclose her German Pirate Party association in her public witness biography or her witness statement when last accessed today, which is ambiguous at best and misleading at worst. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:36 am by INFORRM
On those aspects which reach the Court, there will be uniformity in the Member States. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 11:09 am by Jennifer Davis
In 1954, just two months before she died, the Court made the landmark decision of Brown v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
But query whether in the federalism context, where other plain-statement rules such as that announced in 1991 in Gregory v Ashcroft (which requires Congress to clearly say in the text of a regulatory statute that the statute applies to state and local government entities before states can be required to obey) seem designed to make sure Congress has carefully considered state interests, Congress itself has to be the one to fix any vagueness problems in the terms of… [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
State Bar of California, the Court held that the dues couldn't be used for political advocacy that wasn't "germane" to "the State's interest in regulating the legal profession and improving the quality of legal services. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Resolved – IPSO mediation 08369-19 Miller v The Sunday Times, No breach – after investigation Resolution statement 07779-19 Wallace v Echo (Basildon), Resolved – IPSO mediation 07037-19 Foley v Mail Online, No breach – after investigation 06303-19 Hoy v Wisbech Standard, No breach – after investigation 06056-19 Baker v The Daily Telegraph, Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 05072-19 Smith v… [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:34 pm by David Kopel
In other words, "the sorts of weapons protected were those 'in common use at the time.'" Id. at 627 (quoting United States v. [read post]