Search for: "Global v. March"
Results 921 - 940
of 2,325
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2007, 12:46 am
Law CenterThursday, March 29, 2:45 pm"Globalization of the American Law School": Chantal Thomas, U. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:14 pm
Jonathan Witmer-Rich (Cleveland State) posted this to a discussion list that I'm on, and graciously allowed me to forward it; it's about today's U.S. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
The first is the substantial change in the direction of U.S. policy in trade and globalization. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 12:45 pm
"A Cross-Sectional Quantitative Study on Sexual and Reproductive Health Knowledge and Access to Services of Arab and Kurdish Syrian Refugee Young Women Living in an Urban Setting in Lebanon," International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 18 (Sept. 2021) [open access] - Authors (3) = Germany Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 6:03 pm
The new case is Bilski, et al., v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:09 am
CNIL was unimpressed with Google’s compromise (unsurprisingly, given that it was seeking global delisting and the vast majority of those using Google within the EU would be using an EU version of Google in any event). [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Herrick v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 2:05 am
The matter is set for trial in March 2022. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 2:05 am
The matter is set for trial in March 2022. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 8:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 2:53 am
Burger King Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 2:22 pm
In March, the unanimous Supreme Court decision in Lexmark International v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:53 am
Global TelLink Corp 2017 WL 1160893 (3rd.Cir. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 6:57 am
" But in the Continental v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:10 am
In a legal malpractice case, a plaintiff must establish that the attorney was negligent, that the negligence [*5]proximately caused plaintiff’s losses, and that the negligence damaged the plaintiff (Global Business Inst. v Rivkin Radler, 101 AD3d 651, 651 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:41 am
On 25 March 2019, the Australian Trade Marks Office (ATMO) handed down a decision in Comite International Olympique v Tempting Brands Netherlands BV. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 2:38 am
OPPO/OPPO v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 8:50 pm
In a summary judgment order entered late on Tuesday (January 21, 2014), Judge Lucy Koh, the federal judge presiding over two Apple v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 8:30 am
This round-up complements my previous post featuring climate change-related journal articles published by authors based in the Global South. [read post]
