Search for: "Good v. Good"
Results 921 - 940
of 76,267
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2024, 11:21 pm
” This, of course, comes in the wake of the decision in R (on the Application of TTT) v Michaela School [2024] EWHC 843 (Admin), on which we published a critical guest post by Russell Sandberg, here. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:50 pm
National Security Archive v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
That pro-contact culture is articulated and repeated in both pre-and post-2014 caselaw: essentially that contact is almost always a good thing and will almost always be ordered in some shape or form[8] – a far broader proposition than the statutory presumption. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:39 am
This case is a good cautionary tale of how a descriptive trademark can be turned into an unduly powerful weapon that ultimately hurts consumers. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 1:58 pm
In November 2023, however, the Tax Court issued its decision in Soroban Capital Partners LP v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 11:49 am
AsymaDesign v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:51 am
If Buckley v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 9:32 am
Surti v. [read post]
Dealer Wins on Claim That Franchise Transfer Was Denied Due to Subjective and Unreasonable Standards
7 Jun 2024, 9:11 am
., LLC v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 2:51 am
So it was at UCLA, as reflected in the complaint in Frankel v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:00 pm
Breach of Contract/Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 10:07 am
In Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 9:32 am
(Blacklock's Reporter) v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 8:15 am
The case is Frankel v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:01 am
Part I of the paper presents Justice Lewis Powell's famous attack on presumed damages in Gertz v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
It is arguably a necessary power in order to meet the contingencies that arise over time.In the leading American case, Jackson v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 12:22 pm
Estate of Finley v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
Chief Justice John Marshall used this approach in McCulloch v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 6:36 am
[RTI Limited v MUR Shipping BV [2024 UKSC 18]https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2022-0172-judgment.pdf [read post]