Search for: "Grant v. Long" Results 921 - 940 of 21,320
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2023, 6:52 am by Alex Phipps
Considering (1), the Court of Appeals first explained the two-part test for whether to grant new appointed counsel from State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am by Beatrice Yahia
” Japan said it has asked the United States to suspend all non-emergency V-22 Osprey flights over its region after one of the U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:49 am by Lindsay A. Heller
Days after I wrote about the Guardian Ad Litem (GAL) role for litigants here in the R.B. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am by Dennis Crouch
  If cert is granted, this would be a very important case. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:15 am by Jon Hyman
The answer — courtesy of the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals and its application of SCOTUS's Groff v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 11:15 am by Rose Hughes
Recently, the judge in Sandoz v BMS ([2023] EWCA Civ 472) interpreted G2/21 as being close to an ab initio plausibility standard in line with the UK Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
… The CourtAPPEAL WATCH: Third Party Political Ad Spending Returns to the SCC Docket On November 9, 2023 the Supreme Court of Canada (the “SCC”, or the “Court”) granted the Attorney General of Ontario’s application for leave to appeal [40725] from Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
Court of Appeal finds no reason to swipe right in MATCH v MUZMATCH online dating disputeMatch Group, LLC v Muzmatch Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 454 (April 2023)“MATCH” is hardly a distinctive trade mark for an online dating, aka matchmaking, service. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
For far too long, too many New Yorkers have dealt with the long term physical and psychological pain of this abuse -- pain that has only been magnified by the lack of recourse and accountability. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Ron DeSantis signed into law.Amid so many missteps and missed opportunities, the worst of all was the Supreme Court’s June 29 decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]