Search for: "Graves v. United States" Results 921 - 940 of 1,360
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm by Marty Lederman
"  As the City noted in its brief, "[h]istorically black colleges do not discriminate, for instance, by establishing programs to 'disproportionately appeal to' black students, provided they are 'open to all on a race-neutral basis' (quoting United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Department of Justice and was an assistant to the Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:19 am by Scott Bomboy
About two-thirds of them were Japanese-Americans who were born in the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 5:42 am by Anthony Gaughan
United States, "[N]ever before has the United States sought to enjoin a newspaper from publishing information in its possession. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
  Notes that European Union and United States officials will kick off talks in Washington on 9 Dec 2010 on a personal data protection agreement when cooperating to fight terrorism or crime. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 5:55 am by Victor Kattan
This is because apartheid, in addition to being a prohibited act under international law, is also a crime against humanity and a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 8:01 am by Bridget Dooling
This rule, which applied to large employers in the United States, was one part of a multipronged strategy to address the ongoing pandemic, which the administration has framed as both a public health crisis and a national security threat. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 8:03 pm by Andrew J. Batog
”[6] As Henry Kissinger, a figure who stands as perhaps the chief opponent of universal jurisdiction in the United States, blithely asserted, “the notion that heads of state and senior public officials should have the same standing as outlaws (such as pirates) before the bar of justice is quite new. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Michael C. Dorf
Those harms to which the state plaintiffs pointed in Dep't of Commerce--"diminishment of political representation, loss of federal funds, degradation of census data, and diversion of resources" away from Democratic-leaning political units and towards Republican-leaning ones--were the reason for the citizenship question. [read post]