Search for: "HARPER v. STATE"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,026
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2015, 10:41 pm
She had a strategic plan, modeled on how Thurgood Marshall went after racial discrimination leading to Brown v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:46 am
American Institute of Physics v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:30 pm
The textbook case on this issue is Harper & Row v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 6:39 am
Following New York Times Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 9:32 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, Harper v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 6:04 am
R. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:49 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:14 am
As a party litigant without representation, Mr Wilson was, according to court observers, forced abroad to Japan and the United States for supportive expert medical reports. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am
Q10: In the famous copyright fair use case of Harper & Row v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 8:01 am
Harper, Ph.D.. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:00 am
The Court found preemption of state unfair competition law, then upheld state coverage for sound recordings (then unprotected by copyright) in Goldstein, then upheld state trade secret and contract law, then found preemption of a state law prohibiting copying of boat hulls. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:00 pm
In Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
An application for permission to appeal has been lodged in the case of ZXC v Bloomberg. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 10:52 am
V. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
While in most cases it will be a media defendant who wishes to rely on the defence, there is Privy Council authority to the effect that the privilege can be asserted by a non-media defendant (Seaga v Harper [2008] UKPC 9). [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 5:18 am
Marsh, regarded as the origin of the fair use doctrine in the United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 1:00 am
Vaitheeswaran's Need, Speed, and Greed (Harper), and Philip E. [read post]
