Search for: "HOUSE v. UNITED STATES" Results 921 - 940 of 14,024
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2016, 9:53 am by Ryan Lund
City of San Jose, et al., (2016) On February 29, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United States denied the California Building Industry’s petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of the decision of the California Supreme Court in California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:03 am by Atty. Gregory A. Holbus
About 2-1/2 months after hearing oral arguments, the Supreme Court of the United States today rendered its decision in the case of Hamilton v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:43 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
The Court of Appeal decision The Court of Appeal reviewed a number of authorities on the meaning of “house”, including Lake v Bennett [1970] 1 Q.B. 663, Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeons Homes [1982] A.C. 755, Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 W.L.R. 289, (where the House of Lords held that, when deciding whether a building had been designed or adapted for living in, one is largely concerned with the physical… [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:30 pm by Jane Chong
” That process unfolds as follows: the Attorney General may (and reliably does) oppose the request for disclosure by filing an affidavit stating that the disclosure “would harm the national security of the United States,” per 50 U.S.C. [read post]
29 May 2024, 2:09 pm by NARF
H.R.8562 - To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the provision of direct housing loans and medical care from the Department of Veterans Affairs for Native Hawaiians. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:30 am by Shari Shapiro
  As a result, Chapter 9 violates the Supremacy Clause in Article VI of the United State Constitution. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:31 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The order made by the Outer House in December 2018 was expressed in the present tense, making clear that the Secretary of State was “continuing” to act in breach of section 61 of the 2013 Act by failing to bring the forum bar provisions into force. [read post]