Search for: "Hale v. Hale"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,470
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2012, 5:46 pm
Hale v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:53 am
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am
The extra hearing is scheduled in order to hear representations on a number of important issues of principle in relation to the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, which were not fully explored at the original hearing, and will be heard by a panel of nine (Lady Hale, Lords Phillips, Walker, Judge, Kerr, Clarke, Wilson and Reed and Sir Anthony Hughes). [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:24 am
See Marks v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 5:52 pm
Bollinger, and Grutter v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 3:33 pm
In Kitroser v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 1:59 pm
Stuart Hale Co., 1 F.3d 611, 618 (7th Cir. 1993). [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:36 am
One v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
He had been a partner at the Washington, D.C. law firm of Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale and Dorr which he joined in 1978. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:00 am
However, the second of his examples makes it clear that very adverse consequences for an applicant (or per Baroness Hale, the “extremity of consequences for the individual”) are capable, in combination with a strong argument that there has been an error of law, of amounting to “some other compelling reason.” The examples of Lord Dyson, in the case of Cart v the Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28 were, … (i) a case where it is strongly arguable that the… [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
" In that article reprinted in Corporate Counsel, Saranac Hale Spencer details the ruling in Sealord Holdings v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:47 am
Lord Phillips considered the various formulations of the test of “public interest” in Reynolds ([2001] 2 AC 127) and Jameel ([2007] 1 AC 359), agreeing with Lady Hale’s formulation in the latter case that “There must be some real public interest in having this information in the public domain. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:11 pm
In Maples v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:28 am
Lord Phillips considered the various formulations of the test of “public interest” in Reynolds [2001] 2 AC 127 and Jameel [2007] 1 AC 359, agreeing with Lady Hale’s formulation in the latter case that “There must be some real public interest in having this information in the public domain. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:22 am
Lord Phillips considered the various formulations of the test of “public interest” in Reynolds ([2001] 2 AC 127) and Jameel ([2007] 1 AC 359), agreeing with Lady Hale’s formulation in the latter case that “There must be some real public interest in having this information in the public domain. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:26 am
From Tuesday 20 March 2012 over three days are the linked appeals of Perry & Ors v Serious Organised Crime Agency and Perry & Ors (No. 2) v Serious Organised Crime Agency, which will be heard by a panel of nine (L Phillips, L Hale, L Brown, L Judge, L Kerr, L Wilson, L Clarke, L Reed and Sir Anthony Hughes). [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:11 am
In MacLennan the court focussed on four of Lady Hale’s propositions; 1. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by a 4-3 majority (Hale, Kerr and Phillips dissenting). [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am
Starting on Tuesday 13 March 2012 is the one day hearing of NJDB v JEG and anor, on appeal from the Court of Session (Scotland) and to be heard by Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Clarke, Wilson and Reed. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:02 am
The Supreme Court is currently hearing a series of joined cases concerning extradition and the rights of children including KAS or H v The Lord Advocate UKSC 2011/0217, BH v The Lord Advocate UKSC 2011/0210 , F-K (FC) v Polish Judicial Authority UKSC 2012/0039, R (on the application of HH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa UKSC 2011/0128 and R (on the application of PH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa UKSC 2011/0129. [read post]
