Search for: "Harris v. Falls"
Results 921 - 940
of 987
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
Humayun’s practice was to bow his knee when he heard the azaan, and when he did his foot caught the folds of his garment, causing him to fall down several flights. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
Porter v Shepherds Bush HA The Swindon v Aston trap - paying off all arrears and costs on a breached SPO, or one that provides it is ‘unenforceable’ on such paying off, making it unvariable - falls for the reasons already given. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 8:56 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Let the names begin (Intellectual Property Watch) EPO, JPO, USPTO, SIPO and KIPO agree on work sharing initiative (IAM) (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPR-Helpdesk) Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants future work to include global policy challenges (Intellectual Property Watch) End of life for IP (Securing Innovation) Royalty monetization: high-profile deals generate excitement among TTOs (Technology Transfer Tactics) Indentifying valuable… [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 9:11 pm
Presumably that's why the city saw fit to contract out the menial task to a private mom-and-pop operation, rather than using its own workers, not to mention officials.Tooke v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 10:39 am
" I'm in the Anybody-But-Thomas camp on this one.The Harris DA's race features former Houston police chief Clarence Bradford vs. a former judge, Pat Lykos - I was hoping for a Bradford v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 3:23 pm
On Monday night, Delaware Vice Chancellor Lamb issued an opinion in the epic Hexion v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 5:06 pm
Aug. 29, 2008)(per curiam)(presuit discovery mandamus TRCP 202)IN RE SIMON KIBERU AND HARRIS METHODIST H-E-B HOSPITAL; from Tarrant County; 2nd district(02-07-00312-CV, 237 SW3d 445, 11-01-07)stay order issued November 30, 2007, liftedPursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(c), without hearing oral argument, the Courtconditionally grants the petition for writ of mandamus.Bismar, MD v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 3:38 pm
In Scott v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 3:42 pm
LUKE'S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL; from Harris County; 1st district (01-04-00228-CV, 229 SW3d 396, 05-03-07) OPINION BELOW: Marks v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 11:03 am
Now it falls to Congressto legislate compliance. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 12:33 pm
Rev. 791: The Fall of the Citadel (Strict Liability to the Consumer) by William L. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 6:22 am
" The first thing I noticed was that the post failed to provide the case name, which happens to be U.S. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:47 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Supreme Court, June 18, 2008 Munaf v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 1:19 pm
” Wichita County v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 11:50 am
Gertrude denies Harry a job. [read post]
