Search for: "Harris v. Hand"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,511
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2012, 5:59 pm
Brown v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 9:08 am
Brown v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
On 28 January 2020, Steyn J handed down the judgement in DXB v Persons Unknown [2020] EWHC 134 (QB), a claim brought pursuant to “the Venables jurisdiction” for an extension of the anonymity of a child defendant beyond his 18th birthday. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Department of Transportation v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm
[Update] Mr Justice Tugendhat handed down judgment in the case of Ifedha v Archant Regional Ltd at 10.30am on 8 November 2010. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 5:34 am
Indeed, even those with a visa in hand are not guaranteed admission. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:31 pm
” In another case, Sireci v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 6:28 am
" Haskell v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:16 am
That is why, for example, even the historically exemption-resistant California Supreme Court in Harris v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm
Judgment was handed down in Ambrosiadou v Coward [2013] EWHC 58 (QB) (25 January 2013). [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
Therasense v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:21 pm
It can’t post accurate statements about what Brummer did (e.g., that he participated in handing down the Harris/Scholander decision), or opinions about Brummer (e.g., that he is an “Uncle Tom” for participating in that decision). [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
Harris, 116 N.W.2d 133, 135 (Wis. 1962)(noting that "a contract [between a party and a witness] creating an obligation not only to appear but also to testify in a certain manner on behalf of a party to a lawsuit, is against public policy");Shaffer v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
Harris, 116 N.W.2d 133, 135 (Wis. 1962)(noting that "a contract [between a party and a witness] creating an obligation not only to appear but also to testify in a certain manner on behalf of a party to a lawsuit, is against public policy");Shaffer v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
… 18 Long v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 6:47 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 6:01 pm
On Friday, June 13, 2014 SCC delivered the R. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:51 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently declined to rehear en banc Fazaga v. [read post]
