Search for: "Harris v. Harris" Results 921 - 940 of 7,654
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2009, 3:52 pm by Albany Lawyer
Virginia's highest court threw out the conviction in Harris v. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 6:14 am by Erin Dunnavant
In December of last year, my colleague Ashley Harris discussed Security First Insurance Co. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 7:24 am
Harris [decision; Lambda Legal backgrounder], which said that same-sex couples should have "full rights and benefits enjoyed... [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 8:18 am by snahmod
Local Government Liability Under Section 1983 for Failure to Train or Supervise Police in Excessive Force Cases The Supreme Court ruled almost twenty years ago in City of Canton v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 3:22 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] granted certiorari [order list, PDF] Monday in Jones v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:47 am by Andrea Bottorff
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled unanimously [opinion, PDF] Monday in National Meat Association v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 11:01 pm
Harris, the Investment Company Act case that will be argued to the U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 8:45 am by Ryan J. Farrick
According to a lawsuit filed in Manhattan court against Columbia and Professor William V. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm by admin
By Jim Cline In a decision on a case that had presented significant financial and operational important to Public Employee Unions, the United States Supreme Court held this Monday in Harris v Quinn that the Illinois law, as applied to a special class of home health care workers, unconstitutionally imposed a “fair share” dues payment  […]The post In Closely Watched Decision, Supreme Court declines to Hold Mandatory Union Dues Clauses Unconstitutional —… [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 9:30 am
Today's advance release probate law opinion: In re Probate Appeal of Harris (Probate appeal; appeal to trial court from decree of Probate Court admitting decedent's will to probate; claim that trial court erred in concluding that decedent's will was validly attested by two witnesses as required by statute (§ 45a-251); whether Supreme Court's decision in Gardner v. [read post]