Search for: "Hill v. California" Results 921 - 940 of 1,324
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am by Joshua Matz
  The Hill discusses some of the amicus briefs filed recently in support of respondent Antoine Jones in United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:14 am
Chicago, Ill.: Lawrence Hill; Lancaster: Gazelle, 2004.28. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Part of this voter legacy is Proposition 218, enacted in 1996 (California Constitution Art XIIID).The most recent 218 decision, Golden Hills Neighborhood Association, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 6:47 am
., to Plaintiffs Jermaine and William Hills’ Motion in Limine #3 to Exclude Opinion of Jeffrey White, M.D., on Decedent's Life Expectancy THE INSTANT CIRCUMSTANCES DIFFER FROM THE CASES RELIED UPON BY PLAINTIFF Plaintiffs rely on the cases of Jones v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
October 28th of this month will mark the one year anniversary of the publication of the Anti-SLAPP Panel’s Report to the Attorney General on anti-SLAPP legislation. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
By Michael Kiely and Phillip Tate True to their promise, the California Redevelopment Association, or CRA, and the California League of Cities, or CLC, petitioned the California Supreme Court on July 15, 2011 for a writ of mandate challenging the Legislature's adoption of ABX1 26, providing for elimination of California redevelopment agencies (RDAs), and ABX1 27, exempting from elimination any RDA that agrees to make its share of a $1.7 billion voluntary… [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
By Michael Kiely and Phillip Tate True to their promise, the California Redevelopment Association, or CRA, and the California League of Cities, or CLC, petitioned the California Supreme Court on July 15, 2011 for a writ of mandate challenging the Legislature's adoption of ABX1 26, providing for elimination of California redevelopment agencies (RDAs), and ABX1 27, exempting from elimination any RDA that agrees to make its share of a $1.7 billion voluntary… [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:45 pm by WIMS
Potrero Hills Landfill (Potrero Hills), a privately owned solid waste and recycling business (one of the three largest landfills servicing the San Francisco Bay Area) in Solano County, California (the County), and twenty-two related businesses appeal the dismissal on Younger abstention grounds [See Younger v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 1:58 am by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court C D California: To satisfy Twombly and Iqbal infringement pleading must do more than identify accused product: Medsquire LLC v. [read post]