Search for: "Hodges v. Hodges" Results 921 - 940 of 1,671
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2015, 1:30 am by Karen Cornwell, TLT Solicitors
No doubt there will be further developments, as recommended by Lord Hodge for clarification of this “not so grey area”. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am by Frank Cranmer
As was said in Salvesen v Riddell 2013 SC (UKSC) 236 (Lord Hope at para 57), if such an order is made, it may be appropriate to give permission to the Lord Advocate to return to the court for any further orders under section 102(2)(b) as may be required. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:18 am by Samuel Sherwood, Olswang LLP
The Supreme Court’s reasoning was as follows: Non-disclosure of the commissions Lord Sumption held that the decision in Harrison v Black Horse Ltd, the leading Court of Appeal authority, was wrong. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg BNA, Kimberly Robinson reports on Pavan v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 11:47 am by Kalvis Golde
Hodges, in which the justices struck down state bans on same-sex marriage, to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 8:55 am by Don Cruse
For now, here are quick summaries: THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS AND ROUND ROCK FIRE CHIEF LARRY HODGE v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:25 am
Particularly, Lord Sumption, together with Lord Reed, Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs, found that if claims 1 and 3 had been valid, they would not have been infringed, but differed in their reasons. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The majority (Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Hamblen) hold that section 32(1)(c) of the Limitation Act 1980 applies to claims for the restitution of money paid under a mistake of law, with time beginning to run when the claimant discovers or could with reasonable diligence have discovered their mistake in the sense of recognising that they have a worthwhile claim. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 5:25 am
" [Serafin v Serafin, 401 Mich 629, 635-636; 258 NW2d 461 (1977), quoting the Texas Court of Civil Appeals in Davis v Davis, 507 SW2d 841, 847 (Tex Civ App, 1974).] [read post]
Lady Black’s judgment Lady Black extensively reviewed the authorities, beginning with the landmark judgments of the House of Lords in   In re F (Mental Patient: Sterilisation) [1990] 2 AC and Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:03 am by Bryan Heaney
The appeal will be heard by Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:35 am by Liz Williams
Lord Hodge acknowledges the figure is quite striking. 1540: The Lord Advocate makes the submission that in the BRIA is an analysis of the proportionality of the measure, supported by specific evidence and supported by the Sheffield April 2016 study. [read post]